Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The rich get richer? Children’s reasoning about socioeconomic status predicts inclusion and resource bias

Bibliographic Data

ID9796129
AuthorsBrenda Straka (0000-0001-7360-7469, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author), Analia F Albuja (0000-0002-9156-2628, Northeastern University), Analía Albuja, Jane Leer (0000-0002-7594-217X, Health and Human Development (2HD) Research Network), Kaelah Brauher (Duke University), Sarah E Gaither (0000-0002-9833-9218, Duke University)
Year2024
Volume60
Issue3
Pages505-521
Publication date2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopmental Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/dev0001655
PMID38095998
OpenAlexW4389724968
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Children's socioeconomic status (SES) is linked to disparate access to resources and affects social behaviors such as inclusion and resource allocations. Yet it is unclear whether children's essentialized view of SES (i.e., believing SES is immutable) or subjective social status (SSS) influences behavioral biases toward high- versus low-SES peers. We measured 4- to 9-year-old children's SES essentialism and SSS to test whether these predict inclusion and resource allocations to high- versus low-SES peers ( N = 127; from a midsize city in the Southeastern United States; 49.6% female; parent-reported 54.2% White, 2.8% Black, 8.3% Latine, 5.6% Asian, 1.4% another race, 27.8% multiracial, 43.3% not provided). We also compared children's SES beliefs to their parent's. Children's SES essentialism and SSS decreased across the ages tested, and children reported higher SSS than their parents. Parents' SES essentialism predicted younger (but not older) children's SES essentialism. Moreover, SES essentialism mediated the negative relationship between age and preference for including high-SES peers, while SSS mediated the negative relationship between age and preference for allocating more resources to high-SES peers. This suggests that beliefs about the nature of SES may influence sociorelational behavior like including or excluding others, while perceived social status (SSS) may influence resource allocations. Furthermore, older children and those with lower SES essentialism included low- versus high-SES peers more often while older and lower SSS children distributed more resources toward low- versus high-SES peers. Thus, children's SES essentialism and SSS may also influence their behaviors to either perpetuate or rectify inequality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Developmental psychology · Essentialism · Inclusion (mineral · Population · Preference · Social status · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · SSS · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Demography · Gender Studies · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Children’s subjective socioeconomic status and their sharing decisions

    Open Access•Tal Genzel Toberman, Hagit Sabato•International Journal of…•2026

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae