Opposites and Identities

In early sixteenth-century France, uses and conceptions of opposition were varied and shifting. This article analyses some complex and apparently paradoxical notions of opposites and identities found in two very different texts, Charles de Bovelles's Ars oppositorum (1511) and Maurice Scève's Délie (1544), examples of Latin prose philosophy and vernacular love lyric respectively. I argue that Scève's poetry, like Bovelles's theory, reflects profoundly upon opposition, difference and identity. In particular, I focus in the Délie upon relations of opposition and similarity between ‘microcosm’ and ‘macrocosm’, evoked through the poet's use of the ‘jealous sun’ topos. Bovelles explores models of opposition drawn from contrasting generic contexts, including Aristotelian logic and Cusa's mystical theology. However, both the Délie and the Ars diverge in striking ways from strict categorizations of difference and identity (as typified by traditional dialectic). Both think through the relationships between antithetical modes of difference and other kinds, attempting to imagine even the co-existence of difference and identity. Both also present ways in which one relation of difference inflects another, and thus offer particularly complex accounts of dynamic interactions between opposites

Aesthetics · Art · Binary opposition · Dialectic · Epistemology · Identity (music · Linguistics · Literature · Mysticism · Opposition (politics · Poetry · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Topos theory · Historical and Literary Studies · Law · Medieval European Literature and History · Philosophy · Renaissance Literature and Culture

• Difference, Cognition, and Causality

  Kathryn Banks•French Studies•2010

  Add to list

• The Revival of Lullism at Paris, 1499-1516

  Joseph M Victor•Renaissance Quarterly•1975

  Add to list