Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why shouldn’t we cut the human-biosphere umbilical cord

Bibliographic Data

ID9847501
AuthorsLauren Holt (0000-0002-7004-5111, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume133
Pages102821
Publication date2021-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFutures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-3287 • E-ISSN: 1873-6378
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.futures.2021.102821
OpenAlexW3192911403
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited27

Scientific and technological advancements have made many wonderful things possible for humankind. As these continue to develop, civilization may evolve to a stage of technological maturity where humanity could, not merely survive, but flourish under the harshest possible environmental conditions, including those off-planet. Even now, aided by seedbanks and underground bunkers, small pockets of humans have never been better prepared to survive a severe environmental global catastrophe through decoupling from the biosphere. This paper explores the moral desirability of extensive technologically-separated civilizations and, if they are achieved, what our relationship might be to the remaining ecological environment. The paper begins by exploring several visions of techno-adaptation and their appeal before laying out the moral arguments in their favour. I then explore the ways that an extensive technologically mediated, or highly-separated relationship with the biosphere is inherently risky and is likely to endanger an independently functioning biosphere — which has its own intrinsic value. I conclude that humanity should preserve the independence of natural processes and achieving material decoupling cannot justify eroding or damaging the remaining biosphere. Thus, given a choice, cutting the human-biosphere ‘umbilical cord’ is morally undesirable unless done in the service of reducing negative impacts on the biosphere

Biology · Biosphere · Civilization · Dignity · Environmental ethics · Humanity · Political science · Sociology · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution · Ecology · Law · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

  • From the universal to the plural

    Open Access•Maíra Sardão, Pedro Gabriel Silva•Futures•2024

  • Earth-Cosmos Binary

    Open Access•Seth D Baum•Futures•2026

  • How to Count Animals, more or less

    Shelly Kagan•How to Count Animals, More or Less•2019

  • Cascading regime shifts within and across scales

    Open Access•Juan Rocha, Glen D Peterson et al.•Science•2018

  • Accelerated modern human–induced species losses

    Open Access•Gerardo Ceballos, P R Ehrlich et al.•Science Advances•2015

  • Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority

    Open Access•Nick Bostrom•Global Policy•2013

  • Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere

    Open Access•James E Lovelock, Lynn Margulis•Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and…•1974

  • Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Johan Rockström et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Planetary boundaries

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson et al.•Science•2015

  • The conditions of agricultural growth

    Ester Boserup, Robert Chambers•Conditions of Agricultural Growth•2014

  • Technology, Pessimism, and Postmodernism

    Open Access•Howard P Segal, Yaron Ezrahi et al.•Technology, Pessimism, and…•1994

  • The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering

    Open Access•Brian Tomasik•Relations•2015

  • From Counterculture to Cyberculture

    Fred Turner•From Counterculture to Cyberculture•2006

  • Beyond “Natural” and “Cultural” Heritage

    Open Access•R Harrison•Heritage & Society•2015

  • Staying with the Trouble

    Donna Haraway, Donna J Haraway•Staying with the Trouble•2020

  • Imagining transformative biodiversity futures

    Open Access•Carina Wyborn, Federico Davila et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Utilitarianism for a Broken World

    Open Access•Tim Mulgan•Utilitas•2015

  • Space colonization and suffering risks

    Open Access•Phil Torres•Futures•2018

  • Assessing climate change’s contribution to global catastrophic risk

    Open Access•Sj Beard, Lauren Holt et al.•Futures•2021

  • Classifying global catastrophic risks

    Open Access•Shahar Avin, Bonnie C Wintle et al.•Futures•2018

  • The far future argument for confronting catastrophic threats to humanity

    Open Access•Seth D Baum•Futures•2015

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae