Why shouldn’t we cut the human-biosphere umbilical cord
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9847501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren Holt (0000-0002-7004-5111, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 133 |
| Pages | 102821 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-3287 • E-ISSN: 1873-6378 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102821 |
| OpenAlex | W3192911403 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
Scientific and technological advancements have made many wonderful things possible for humankind. As these continue to develop, civilization may evolve to a stage of technological maturity where humanity could, not merely survive, but flourish under the harshest possible environmental conditions, including those off-planet. Even now, aided by seedbanks and underground bunkers, small pockets of humans have never been better prepared to survive a severe environmental global catastrophe through decoupling from the biosphere. This paper explores the moral desirability of extensive technologically-separated civilizations and, if they are achieved, what our relationship might be to the remaining ecological environment. The paper begins by exploring several visions of techno-adaptation and their appeal before laying out the moral arguments in their favour. I then explore the ways that an extensive technologically mediated, or highly-separated relationship with the biosphere is inherently risky and is likely to endanger an independently functioning biosphere — which has its own intrinsic value. I conclude that humanity should preserve the independence of natural processes and achieving material decoupling cannot justify eroding or damaging the remaining biosphere. Thus, given a choice, cutting the human-biosphere ‘umbilical cord’ is morally undesirable unless done in the service of reducing negative impacts on the biosphere
Biology · Biosphere · Civilization · Dignity · Environmental ethics · Humanity · Political science · Sociology · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution · Ecology · Law · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
How to Count Animals, more or less
Cascading regime shifts within and across scales
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses
Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority
Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Planetary boundaries
The conditions of agricultural growth
Technology, Pessimism, and Postmodernism
The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering
From Counterculture to Cyberculture
Beyond “Natural” and “Cultural” Heritage
Staying with the Trouble
Imagining transformative biodiversity futures
Utilitarianism for a Broken World
Space colonization and suffering risks
Assessing climate change’s contribution to global catastrophic risk
Classifying global catastrophic risks
The far future argument for confronting catastrophic threats to humanity
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |