University futures
Insights from a dialectic delphi study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9847893 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Veli Virmajoki (0000-0002-1963-587X, University of Turku, corresponding author), Toni Ahlqvist (0009-0006-9155-9441, University of Turku), Kaisa-Maria Suomalainen (University of Turku), Ira Ahokas (0000-0003-0179-8192, University of Turku) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 180 |
| Pages | 103816 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-3287 • E-ISSN: 1873-6378 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.futures.2026.103816 |
| OpenAlex | W7140619422 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
The future of universities is unclear. They face increasing pressures from market forces, political influence and societal expectations, which is challenging their traditional roles and values. Using a novel dialectic Delphi methodology, this study examined how members of a Finnish university conceptualized and analyzed potential futures extending to 2040. Grounded in a comprehensive literature review, we identified 10 dimensions relevant to universities’ futures, such as purpose, organisational structure and teaching models. We developed a series of statements presenting opposing future trajectories for each dimension—creating the dialectic nature of our approach. This structure was chosen to provoke reflection on distinct futures and to reveal whether participants saw opposing scenarios as incompatible or complementary. The participants assessed the probability and desirability of these futures and provided arguments to explain their perspectives. The findings identify where participants’ assessments of desirability and probability either align, conflict or reveal differing interpretations of the future scenarios and their meanings. This study reveals how university communities can be engaged in reasoning about complex institutional challenges while providing guidance for developing sustainable and balanced university futures. • Uses a dialectic Delphi with opposing statements toward 2040 • Introduces novel Delphi approach that provokes reasoned trade-offs • Explores probable and desirable futures across 10 dimensions. • Focuses on ten linked areas, from funding to teaching to governance. • Shows where probable and desirable futures align or diverge
Delphi · Delphi method · Dialectic · Qualitative research · Delphi Technique in Research · Higher Education Governance and Development · International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Disaggregative policy Delphi
Higher education strategy in digital transformation
Exploring students’ learning experience in online education
Competing values at public universities
Exploring the antecedents of interdisciplinarity at the European Research Council
Universities as change agents in resource-poor local settings
The Third Mission of the university
How student perceptions about online learning difficulty influenced their satisfaction during Canada's Covid‐19 response
The Delphi technique
Consensus measurement in Delphi studies
Beyond Town and Gown
On academic capitalism
What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice
Internally Incentivized Interdisciplinarity
Visioning 2035
Current trends and future challenges of the Austrian Universities of Applied Sciences
An outline of future-oriented dialectics
Black boxes, not green
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |