Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving farming practice through localized land tenure reform

A study of the “Three Rights Separation Reform” implemented in a Shanghai suburb, China

Bibliographic Data

ID9850135
AuthorsPingyang Liu (0000-0001-5149-9188, Fudan University, corresponding author), Aixi Han (0000-0002-9312-7072, Fudan University), Neil Ravenscroft (0000-0001-7196-8420, International Agriculture University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan)
Year2023
Volume123
Issue1
Pages11-24
Publication date2023-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7223 • E-ISSN: 1903-2471
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00167223.2023.2213741
OpenAlexW4377164294
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited65

Collective land rights reform in developing countries is promoted as a means of optimizing the use of land resources by clarifying property rights and encouraging land transfer. However, such mechanisms remain controversial, particularly as the overall cost – transaction, social, cultural – is often judged to be greater than the benefits obtained. In seeking to address whether this is always the case, this paper reports on a study of the “Three Rights Separation Reform” implemented in a Shanghai suburb, China. The paper argues that localized implementation of land rights reform can provided the context in which farmers feel more secure and have better expectations with respect to land rights, which can stimulate them to modernize and improve their farming practices. We argue that localized implementation, with a combination of top down regulations and bottom up practices, allied to both expert and tacit knowledges, effectively reduces the overall transaction cost and offers flexibility for the local community to find their own solutions under complex socio-economic conditions. We conclude by arguing that additional research and reforms are required to further reduce the transaction cost and enhance farmers’ long-term expectations and experience

Agriculture · Business · China · Context (archaeology · Database transaction · Economic growth · Economic system · Economics · Flexibility (engineering · Geography · Land law · Land tenure · Political science · Property rights · Public economics · Transaction cost · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Finance · Land Rights and Reforms · Law

  • Conditional promotion of urban-rural integration through China's rural homestead reform pilots

    Open Access•Xing Niu, Wangshuai Zhou et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Economic Analysis of Property Rights

    Open Access•Yoram Barzel•Economic Analysis of Property…•1997

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction

    World Bank, Klaus W Deininger•Land policies for growth and…•2003

  • Property Rights and Economic Development

    Timothy Besley, Maitreesh Ghatak•Development Economics•2010

  • The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries

    Open Access•Steven Lawry, Cyrus Samii et al.•Journal of Development…•2017

  • Barbed Wire

    Richard Hornbeck•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2010

  • Property rights for the poor

    Open Access•Sebastián Galiani, Ernesto Schargrodsky•Journal of Public Economics•2010

  • Farmers Are Growing Further and Further from the Land

    Zhu Dongliang, Zhu Dong-liang•Social Sciences in China•2021

  • Induced Institutional Change or Transaction Costs? The Economic Logic of Land Reallocations in Chinese Agriculture

    James Kai‐sing Kung, James Kai-Sing Kung et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2011

  • Investigating the impacts of increased rural land tenure security

    Open Access•Daniel Higgins, Tim Balint et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Formalizing community forest tenure rights

    Open Access•Koen Kusters, Maartje de Graaf et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2022

  • Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity

    Open Access•Nicoletta Stame•Evaluation•2004

  • The knowledge cultures of changing farming practices in a water town of the Southern Yangtze Valley, China

    Open Access•Pingyang Liu, Neil Ravenscroft et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2015

  • Land tenure and investment incentives

    Open Access•James Fenske•Journal of Development Economics•2010

  • Political connections and land-related investment in rural Vietnam

    Open Access•Thomas Markussen, Finn Tarp•Journal of Development Economics•2014

  • Three Rights Separation reform and its impact over farm’s productivity

    Open Access•Maogang Gong, Hanjin Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Three rights separation

    Open Access•Qianxi Wang, Xiaoling Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Do farmers adopt fewer conservation practices on rented land? Evidence from straw retention in China

    Open Access•Li Gao, Wendong Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China

    Open Access•Shuhao Tan, Nico Heerink et al.•Land Use Policy•2006

  • China’s new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation

    Open Access•Ang Li, Jianguo Wu et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Land tenure (in)security and crop-tree intercropping in rural Xinjiang, China

    Open Access•Fangping Rao, Max Spoor et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Rural land rights reform and agro-environmental sustainability

    Open Access•Yuting Xu, Xianjin Huang et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Collective action in China’s recent collective forestry property rights reform

    Open Access•Pingyang Liu, Neil Ravenscroft•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Whose land? The political economy of land titling in transitional economies

    Open Access•Peter Ho, Max Spoor•Land Use Policy•2006

  • Farmland tenure in China

    Open Access•Xianlei Ma, Nico Heerink et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Subjective land ownership and the endowment effect in land markets

    Open Access•Jinming Yan, Yumeng Yang et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Effects of land transfer quality on the application of organic fertilizer by large-scale farmers in China

    Open Access•Bowei Li, Yueqin Shen•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Rural land system reforms in China

    Open Access•Yang Zhou, Xunhuan Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • The Potential Application of Qualitative Evaluation Methods in European Regional Development

    Frank Vanclay•Regional Studies•2013

  • The Profits of Power

    Marjorie Goldstein, Markus Goldstein et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2008

  • Property Rights and Investment Incentives

    Timothy Besley•Journal of Political Economy•1995

  • The new urban agricultural geography of Shanghai

    Open Access•Dang Ding, Pingyang Liu et al.•Geoforum•2018

  • Divergence in Community Participation Policy

    Steve Rolfe•Local Government Studies•2016

  • Getting beneath the surface in program planning, monitoring and evaluation

    Open Access•Marina Apgar, Will Allen et al.•Action Research•2016

  • The Prejudices of Property Rights

    Open Access•Espen Sjaastad, Daniel W Bromley•Development Policy Review•2000

  • Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal

    Open Access•Arun Agrawal, Elinor Ostrom et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2001

  • Land Transfer and the Pursuit of Agricultural Modernization inChina

    Open Access•J Ye•Journal of Agrarian Change•2015

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae