Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Territorial Cohesion in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden 2007 and 2017

Bibliographic Data

ID9850146
AuthorsDaniel Rauhut (0000-0002-9146-9984, Karelian Institute, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland, corresponding author), Nuno Marques Da Costa (0000-0003-4859-9668, University of Lisbon)
Year2021
Volume121
Issue1
Pages1-14
Publication date2021-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7223 • E-ISSN: 1903-2471
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00167223.2021.1920444
OpenAlexW3172691545
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

To what extent territorial cohesion is achieved or not, due to the EU Cohesion Policy, national regional policies, or globalization forces, is debated. This paper aims at discussing territorial cohesion at a NUTS 3 level in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden for 2007 and 2017 by using the Territorial Cohesion Development Index. The findings indicate a) that bigger cities and highly urbanized regions in Denmark, Finland and Sweden perform very well in the Territorial Cohesion Development Index, while non-core and peripheral regions fell further behind; and b) all Norwegian regions and the Åland Islands have high scores in the Territorial Cohesion Development Index. The findings indicate a need to resuscitate the national regional policies in Denmark, Finland and Sweden to counteract the increasing gap between the capital region and the rest of the regions

Capital region · Cohesion (chemistry · Economic geography · Geography · Index (typography · Norwegian · Political science · Polish socio-economic development · Regional Development and Policy · Regional resilience and development

  • A comparative study of influencing factors in urban and rural elderly care services in China

    Peng Li, Chokchai Suttawet•Asia Pacific Journal of Social…•2025

  • Regional development, power and topological reach

    Richard Ek, Daniel Rauhut•Regional Studies•2023

  • EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth

    Open Access•Daniel Rauhut, Alois Humer•European Planning Studies•2020

  • The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)

    Andrés Rodríguez-Pose•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2017

  • Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe

    Roberta Capello, Andrea Caragliu et al.•Journal of Economic Geography•2015

  • Territorial cohesion under pressure? Welfare policy and planning responses in Austrian and Swedish Peripheries

    Open Access•Eva Gruber, Daniel Rauhut et al.•Papers of the Regional Science…•2017

  • Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism

    Open Access•Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, Lewis Dijkstra•Regional Studies•2020

  • Territorial Cohesion Cities

    Eduardo Medeiros, Daniel Rauhut•Regional Studies•2018

  • Uneven geographical development and socio-spatial justice and solidarity

    Open Access•Costis Hadjimichalis•European Urban and Regional Studies•2011

  • Towards a regional urban agenda

    Open Access•Federica Isola, Federica Leone et al.•Regional Studies Regional Science•2017

  • Place-based innovation in Cohesion Policy

    Open Access•Alys Solly•Regional Studies Regional Science•2016

  • The geography of EU discontent

    Open Access•Lewis Dijkstra, Hugo Poelman et al.•Regional Studies•2019

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae