Territorial Cohesion in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden 2007 and 2017
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9850146 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Rauhut (0000-0002-9146-9984, Karelian Institute, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland, corresponding author), Nuno Marques Da Costa (0000-0003-4859-9668, University of Lisbon) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7223 • E-ISSN: 1903-2471 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00167223.2021.1920444 |
| OpenAlex | W3172691545 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 36 |
To what extent territorial cohesion is achieved or not, due to the EU Cohesion Policy, national regional policies, or globalization forces, is debated. This paper aims at discussing territorial cohesion at a NUTS 3 level in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden for 2007 and 2017 by using the Territorial Cohesion Development Index. The findings indicate a) that bigger cities and highly urbanized regions in Denmark, Finland and Sweden perform very well in the Territorial Cohesion Development Index, while non-core and peripheral regions fell further behind; and b) all Norwegian regions and the Åland Islands have high scores in the Territorial Cohesion Development Index. The findings indicate a need to resuscitate the national regional policies in Denmark, Finland and Sweden to counteract the increasing gap between the capital region and the rest of the regions
Capital region · Cohesion (chemistry · Economic geography · Geography · Index (typography · Norwegian · Political science · Polish socio-economic development · Regional Development and Policy · Regional resilience and development
EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth
The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)
Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe
Territorial cohesion under pressure? Welfare policy and planning responses in Austrian and Swedish Peripheries
Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism
Territorial Cohesion Cities
Uneven geographical development and socio-spatial justice and solidarity
Towards a regional urban agenda
Place-based innovation in Cohesion Policy
The geography of EU discontent
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |