Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factors Influencing Pay Decisions

Balancing Managerial Vulnerabilities

Bibliographic Data

ID9887995
AuthorsD C Martins (0000-0003-1195-3838, American University, corresponding author), David C Martin (Kogod College of Business Administration, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue N.W., Washington D.C. 20016.)
Year1987
Volume40
Issue7
Pages417-429
Publication date1987-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-7267 • E-ISSN: 1741-282X
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/001872678704000702
OpenAlexW2110101372
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited18

This study investigated the pay raise distributions of allocators when their job situations make them particularly dependent on subordinates. The study compared recommended pay raises when the worker was a high or average performer, had high or low specialized expertise relative to the particular work unit circumstances, and either used no influence attempt, voiced an inequity complaint, or engaged in ingratiating behaviors involving complimenting the manager and expressing conformity with the manager's views. The situation was described as one in which high performance was important, the staff was somewhat underpaid, and availability of alternative employment in the external job market was good. As expected, larger raises were assigned people with better performance. However, allocators also gave significantly higher pay raises when the subordinate had high specialized expertise relative to the particular circumstance. Contrary to predictions, however, influence attempts were not significantly better than no action in obtaining pay raises, although an inequity complaint was significantly more successful than ingratiating behaviors. The implications of the findings for future research are discussed

Allocator · Business · Complaint · Conformity · Political science · Unit (ring theory · Work (physics · Computer Science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Marketing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations

    Randall A Gordon•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • Influence tactics and work outcomes

    Open Access•Chad A Higgins, Timothy A Judge et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2002

  • Pay and organizational effectiveness

    Edward E Lawler•Pay and organizational…•1971

  • Compliments

    Open Access•Mark L Knapp, Robert Hopper et al.•Journal of Communication•1984

  • Ingratiation and the use of power

    David Kipnis, Richard Vanderveer•Journal of Personality and Social…•1971

  • Inequity and interpersonal conflict

    Gerald S Leventhal, James W Michaels et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1972

  • Factors in reward distribution

    Jayne E Stake•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Compensation Theory and Practice

    Steven P Wolf, Steven Wolf et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1984

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.07
Citation span1996 - 2002 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae