I. Free Movement of Goods

The last contribution on this topic, which was published in the July 1997 issue of the Quarterly , 1 examined the Court's remarkable ruling in CIA Security International S.A. v. Signalson SA and Securitel SPRL , 2 in which the Full Court decided that where a member State neglects to notify draft national technical regulations to the Commission in breach of the obligations set out in Directive 83/189, 3 it may not rely on those regulations in subsequent proceedings before national courts. The Court's ruling attaches a meaningful penalty to State failure to abide by the obligations of notification stipulated by the Directive. It thereby induces compliance with requirements of transparency on which the Commission pins great faith in its “post-1992” strategy for the management of the internal market. The case law since CIA Security has generated a sufficient number of further illuminating rulings to justify a further tour of the area in this contribution

Business · Commission · Directive · Disadvantage · Economics · European court of justice · European union · European Union law · Expansionism · Free movement · Function (biology · Good faith · International trade · Law and economics · Member state · Member states · Political science · State (computer science · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Corporate Governance and Law · European and International Law Studies · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · International Law and Aviation · Law · Law, logistics, and international trade · Taxation and Legal Issues

• Free Movements of Goods

  Open Access•Joseph A McMahon, Joe McMahon et al.•International and Comparative Law…•2001

  Add to list

• II. Free Movement of Goods

  Open Access•Stephen Weatherill•International and Comparative Law…•2003

  Add to list