Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jurisdiction to Grant an Interim Freezing Order

Anglo-Japanese Comparison

Bibliographic Data

ID9929832
AuthorsKoji Takahashi (0009-0001-4578-8685, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume48
Issue2
Pages431-436
Publication date1999-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020589300063272
OpenAlexW2135481883
LanguageEN

If a defendazCnt to legal proceedings conceals or dissipates his assets before a judgment is given, the execution of the ensuing judgment may become impossible. To preserve the possibility that a future judgment will be executed, both English and Japanese courts have power to grant interim relief freezing a defendant's assets. As is well known, this is achieved in England by the Mareva injunction, which is now called simply “freezing injunction” with the implementation of the new Civil Procedure Rules. In Japan, it is the kari-sashiosae order available under the Civil Interim Relief Law ( Minji Hozen Ho ) 1 which serves this purpose

Business · Civil procedure · Economics · Interim · Jurisdiction · Law and economics · Order (exchange · Political science · European and International Contract Law · Finance · Law · Law, logistics, and international trade · Legal principles and applications

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae