Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Report on the Workshop on Practical Protection in Humanitarian Crises

Bibliographic Data

ID9954833
AuthorsElizabeth Moller (Migration Policy Institute, corresponding author), Patricia Weiss Fagen (Migration Policy Institute), Susan Martin (0000-0002-9594-5036, Migration Policy Institute)
Year2002
Volume40
Issue6
Pages117-137
Publication date2002-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Migration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7985 • E-ISSN: 1468-2435
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2435.00225
OpenAlexW2001418380
LanguageEN

With a global crisis of approximately 15 million refugees and an estimated 20 to 25 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in need of protection, the current protection regime is under increased scrutiny. “Practical Protection” is a fairly new concept. Those pursuing it aim to expand understanding and responsibilities for protection beyond those institutions with a specific protection mandate. “The Workshop on Practical Protection in Humanitarian Crises” was organized to bring the practical protection concept to representatives from a wide range of international agencies, governmental agencies and non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), who discussed its implications for their work in humanitarian crises. Organizations with specific protection mandates, primarily the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC), work to protect uprooted groups through legal tools and recognized principles, often in the context of assistance programmes that provide shelter, food, water, medical care, education and other forms of humanitarian assistance. They work in collaboration with NGOs and other international organizations that focus primarily on assisting forced migrants. These latter agencies have traditionally avoided overt involvement in protection activities. When UNHCR and ICRC are not present or are over‐extended, gaps in the protection regime emerge. The gap is particularly evident with regard to internally displaced and other war‐affected populations, but it is present in most refugee situations as well

Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Humanitarian aid · Internally displaced person · Mandate · Political science · Refugee · Scrutiny · Work (physics · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Engineering · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Public Administration

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae