Between the ‘Governance’ Model and the Policy Evaluation Act
New Public Management in Japan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9961369 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hiroko Kudo (0000-0001-5827-4053, Waseda University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 483-504 |
| Publication date | 2003-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0020852303694005 |
| OpenAlex | W1985817183 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
This article tries to describe Japanese npm (New Public Management) from two opposite poles: from the national legislative framework and from an experimental example in local government. Since the late 1990s, although npm was developed from Anglo-Saxon experiences, it has been implemented in Japan at the national level in a unique manner. The crisis in public finance, the urgent need for public sector reform and political instability led to two extreme options: self-reform by the bureaucracy itself; and citizen empowerment resulting inpressure on the bureaucracy. While the second one has been struggling to obtain public consensus, expertise for its practice and institutionalization, the first has resulted, to a certain extent, in the reorganization and restructuring of administrative institutions andin the establishment of both a legal framework and an operational system for measuring performance and evaluating policy
Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Economics · Government (linguistics · Institutionalisation · Legislature · New public management · Political science · Politics · Public management · Public sector · Restructuring · Finance · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |