Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations

A qualitative study

Bibliographic Data

ID9963924
AuthorsAnna Uster (0000-0001-8450-8415, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, corresponding author), Hedva Vinarski-Peretz (0000-0003-4062-6414, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College)
Year2025
Volume92
Issue1
Pages141-163
Publication date2025-12-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00208523251369314
OpenAlexW4417116984
LanguageEN
References cited56

The importance of managerial autonomy for organizational performance and accountability is increasingly acknowledged in municipally owned corporations (MOCs) operating within competitive environments. However, few studies have examined the factors enabling or restricting chief executive officers' (CEOs') managerial autonomy in companies reliant on local and central governments. Using the public agency autonomy perspective, we investigate the subjective perceptions of MOCs’ executives concerning three intertwined political and bureaucratic mechanisms. The results of our 18 semi-structured interviews with CEOs of such corporations in various Israeli municipal authorities identified three factors on the micro, meso and macro levels affecting their autonomy. These findings reveal a pattern whereby local political and bureaucratic actors try to engage in framed autonomy, in contrast to the administrative bureaucracy model of the central government that curtails the CEOs’ autonomy substantially. Consequently, this dynamic impedes MOCs from achieving their goals. This interplay of micro, meso and macro factors explains how tensions between local and central governments are reflected in the managerial operations of MOCs. Points for practitioners Leverage Supportive Political Relationships to Navigate Constraints: Building trust-based ties with supportive political actors can help mitigate regulatory burdens and enable more adaptive decision-making within bureaucratic constraints. Balance Board Governance with Managerial Discretion: Practitioners should remain alert to how political appointments may influence operations and develop strategies to preserve managerial discretion while maintaining accountability. Promote Two-Way Engagement with Central Authorities: Public executives should advocate for more reciprocal relationships with central agencies, encouraging support-oriented oversight that acknowledges on-the-ground realities

Accountability · Agency (philosophy · Autonomy · Bureaucracy · Central government · Corporate governance · Discretion · Government (linguistics · Politics · E-Government and Public Services · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Delegation in the Regulatory State

    Fabrizio Gilardi•Delegation in the Regulatory State•2008

  • Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis

    Open Access•Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Jacqueline Jones et al.•Journal of Nursing Education and…•2016

  • The study of organisational autonomy

    Open Access•Koen Verhoest, B Guy Peters et al.•Public Administration and…•2004

  • Sampling for qualitative research

    Open Access•Martin Marshall, Martin N Marshall•Family Practice•1996

  • The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective

    B Guy Peters, Jon Pierre•Politicization of the Civil…•2004

  • Lessons and challenges of China's state‐led and party‐dominated governance model

    Open Access•Yuqing Yang•Global Policy•2023

  • Pressure, Legitimacy, and Innovative Behavior by Public Organizations

    Open Access•Koen Verhoest, Bram Verschuere et al.•Governance•2007

  • In control we trust!? Exploring formal control configurations for municipally owned corporations

    Open Access•Tobias Krause, Tobias Alexander Krause et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2021

  • Autonomy and Control of State Agencies

    Open Access•Koen Verhoest, Paul G Roness et al.•Autonomy and Control of State…•2010

  • The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations

    Open Access•Bart Voorn, Marieke L van Genugten et al.•Local Government Studies•2017

  • Centralization, neoliberalism, and housing policy central–local government relations and residential development in Israel

    Open Access•Sharon Eshel, Ravit Hananel•Environment and Planning C…•2018

  • Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research

    O C Robinson•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2013

  • Performance of municipally owned corporations

    Open Access•Bart Voorn, Marieke Van Genugten et al.•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2020

  • Define, Explain, Justify, Apply’ (Deja)

    Syanda Alpheous Mthuli, Fayth Ruffin et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Enhancing Local Service Effectiveness Through Purpose-Oriented Networks

    Open Access•Anna Uster, Dana R Vashdi et al.•The American Review of Public…•2022

  • Reputation and Public Administration

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter, Daniel P Carpenter et al.•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Public Management and Politics

    Open Access•Luc Rouban•Public Administration•2007

  • Autonomy and managerial reforms in Europe

    Open Access•Philippe Bezes, Gilles Jeannot•Public Administration•2017

  • Dealing with multiple principals in at arm's length organizations

    Open Access•Bart Voorn, Marieke Van Genugten•Public Administration•2021

  • Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy

    Open Access•Martino Maggetti, Koen Verhoest•International Review of…•2014

  • Explaining variation in perceived managerial autonomy and direct politicization in European public sectors

    Open Access•Steven Van De Walle•International Review of…•2019

  • Local government’s response to dissatisfaction with centralized policies

    Open Access•Anna Uster, Nissim Cohen•International Review of…•2023

  • Public Authorities and Intermunicipal Cooperation in a European Context

    Open Access•Anders Lidström•Urban Affairs Review•2016

  • Attitudes of European Local Councillors towards Local Governance Reforms

    Eran Razin, Anna Hazan•Local Government Studies•2014

  • Controlling Regulatory Agencies

    Open Access•Per Lægreid, Paul G Rone et al.•Scandinavian Political Studies•2008

  • De facto independence after delegation

    Open Access•Martino Maggetti•Regulation & Governance•2007

  • Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties

    Open Access•Werner Krause, Denis Cohen et al.•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • Local governments and their arm’s length bodies

    Open Access•Marieke Van Genugten, Sandra Van Thiel et al.•Local Government Studies•2020

  • Elected mayors andde factodecentralisation, Israeli style

    David Dery•Local Government Studies•1998

  • Ten years after

    Antonio F Tavares•Local Government Studies•2017

  • Delimiting citizen participation

    Moshe Dror, Amos Zehavi•Local Government Studies•2022

  • Successful Problem Solvers? Managerial Performance Information Use to Improve Low Organizational Performance

    Open Access•Jakob Majlund Holm•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • Citizens' Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration

    Eran Vigoda‐gadot, E Vigoda-Gadot•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism

    Open Access•D Levi-Faur•The Annals of the American…•2005

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae