A panel data analysis of the impacts of institutional differences on local governments' budgetary decisions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9964449 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Soojin Kim (0000-0003-3141-8621, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Tae Ho Eom (Yonsei University, Republic of Korea, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 559-579 |
| Publication date | 2015-04-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0020852314564306 |
| OpenAlex | W2333761127 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 28 |
This study provides empirical evidence on how institutional differences influence school budget decisions by using panel data from 178 K-12 New Jersey school districts for the period 1996 to 2007. The findings obtained by the Newey-West model, correcting heteroskedasticity and serial correlation, support our hypothesis that school districts with elected school boards (Type II districts) are more likely to be effective at lowering school spending than ones with appointed school boards (Type I districts). Viewing school systems through the lens of new institutional economics, this study argues that institutional differences in governance are critical in leading to differences in budgetary decisions by affecting incentive structures faced by public officials, along with transaction costs and agency costs. Points for practitioners To date, the issue of the impact of institutional differences on local budgetary decisions has been an ongoing topic of debate among many scholars and practitioners in the public administration field. This implies that as an effective incentive structure as well as constraint mechanism, direct electoral institutions in school districts can be a valuable tool to control growing education spending by placing clear accountability on school boards in shaping school budget decisions. Policy makers should consider feasible strategies accompanied by institutional changes in a situation in which local governments are challenged to manage their budget effectively under fiscal stress
Accountability · Agency (philosophy · Budget constraint · Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Incentive · Microeconomics · Panel data · Political science · Public economics · Sociology · Transaction cost · Finance · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · School Choice and Performance
Working, Shirking, and Sabotage
Voters as Fiscal Conservatives
Heteroskedasticity-Robust Standard Errors for Fixed Effects Panel Data Regression
Bureaucrats and Politicians
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
The effects of voter control on budget outcomes
Rational Choice and Regional Governance
A Quasi-Market Framework for Development Competition
The impact of citizen influence on local government expenditure
Testing political economy’s ‘as if’ proposition
The determination of local public expenditures and the principal and agent relation
Representative versus direct democracy
The choice of municipal government structure and public expenditures
Fiscal effects of budget referendums
Institutional Collective Action and Economic Development Joint Ventures
Credible Commitment and Council‐Manager Government
Micro Estimates of Public Spending Demand Functions and Tests of the Tiebout and Median-Voter Hypotheses
Forms of government and spending on common municipal functions
Legal Control of Public Administration
Besieged
Rethinking Federalism
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2021 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |