Early Chartist Organization and the Convention of 1839
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9968514 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kenneth Judge (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1975 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 370-397 |
| Publication date | 1975-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Social History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8590 • E-ISSN: 1469-512X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020859000005022 |
| OpenAlex | W2153011170 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 5 |
With the imprisonment of many activists throughout the year, the rejection of the first National Petition in July, the dissolution of the Convention in September, and the catastrophe of the ill-fated Newport Rising in November, early Chartism ended in failure in the second half of 1839. One of the most common reasons given in the literature for the failure has been the lack of internal cohesion in the movement, usually illustrated by reference to the political conflicts between physical- and moral-force groups. Despite the analytical inadequacy of such generic terms it is indisputable that Chartism was deficient in natural unity. It was a coalition of many different radical associations and personalities with a multiplicity of varied experiences, traditions and beliefs. As a consequence, the early Chartist movement only made progress by adopting certain symbols of unification: the National Petition and Rent, and a commitment to a National Convention. These symbols then became specific goals of Chartism. However, little consideration has previously been given to asking whether Chartism was an efficient instrument in itself for achieving these objectives, or if the organization of the Convention undermined the political credibility of the movement. This article attempts to illustrate Chartism's need for organization and leadership from the Convention, and suggests that inefficient organization was an important cause of the relative failure to achieve its immediate objectives, and for the progressive abdication of leadership by the Convention
Convention · Imprisonment · Political science · Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Law
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
| Citation span | 1978 - 1985 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |