A Study in Failure
Thomas Attwood, M.P. For Birmingham, 1832–1839
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8959007 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Mo (0000-0001-5195-1744, University of Alberta, corresponding author), D J Moss |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 545-570 |
| Publication date | 1978-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00019762 |
| OpenAlex | W1973661217 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 13 |
Contemporary reactions to the 1832 Reform Act were diverse. Concomitant with the feeling of relief that a revolution had been avoided was a fear even among some of the Bill's most earnest advocates that the whigs had perhaps gone too far. The long period of political agitation by extra-parliamentary associations suggested that a radical House of Commons might emerge from the forthcoming elections. In fact, the expected radical onslaught never really materialized. Although they were returned to the Commons in strength by the election of December, the radicals failed to find common ground for action and the whigs successfully defended the pact given royal assent the previous summer. That sentence of failure is not unreasonable. Radicalism in the early nineteenth century was by its very nature the province of the individualist whose imagination often ranged beyond the bounds of practicality and who found compromise irksome. Membership of the House of Commons was to prove a chastening experience for men accustomed to the adulation of the common people. Rules of procedure and the traditional circle of agenda so circumscribed these enthusiasts that energy became sapped and their sense of mission vitiated. Woodward's suggestion, too, that the radicals floundered because they ‘defended the interests of a class to which they did not belong’ may contain a measure of truth. But apart from the odd chapter in the occasional biography, there has been a marked lack of interest in proceeding beyond these general conclusions; failure is too often equated with justified obscurity
Compromise · House of Commons · Individualism · Jurisprudence · Liberal Party · Parliament · Political radicalism · Political science · Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,04 |
| Citation span | 1981 - 2005 (25) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |