Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Terrestrial carbon losses from mountaintop coal mining offset regional forest carbon sequestration in the 21st century

Bibliographic Data

ID15544634
AuthorsJ Elliott Campbell (0000-0002-3087-0571, University of California, Merced, corresponding author), James F Fox (0000-0001-7536-7681, University of Kentucky), Peter M Acton (University of Kentucky)
Year2012
Volume7
Issue4
Pages045701-045701
Publication date2012-10-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045701
OpenAlexW2114766737
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

Studies that quantify the spatial and temporal variability of carbon sources and sinks provide process-level information for the prediction of future levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide as well as verification of current emission agreements. Assessments of carbon sources and sinks for North America that compare top-down atmospheric constraints with bottom-up inventories find particularly large carbon sinks in the southeastern US. However, this southeastern US sink may be impacted by extreme land-use disturbance events due to mountaintop coal mining (MCM). Here we apply ecosystem modeling and field experiment data to quantify the potential impact of future mountaintop coal mining on the carbon budget of the southern Appalachian forest region. For projections based on historical mining rates, grassland reclamation, and the continued regrowth of un-mined forests, we find that the southern Appalachian forests switch from a net carbon sink to a net carbon source by year 2025–33 with a 30%–35% loss in terrestrial carbon stocks relative to a scenario with no future mining by the year 2100. Alternatively, scenarios of forest sequestration due to the effect of CO _2 fertilization result in a 15%–24% loss in terrestrial carbon stocks by the year 2100 for mining scenarios relative to scenarios with no future mining. These results suggest that while power plant stack emissions are the dominant life-cycle stage in coal-fired electricity, accounting for mountaintop coal mining in bottom-up inventories may be a critical component of regional carbon budgets

Atmospheric carbon cycle · Carbon cycle · Carbon dioxide · Carbon sequestration · Carbon sink · Coal · Coal mining · Ecosystem · Geography · Sink (geography · Terrestrial ecosystem · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Environmental Science · Fire effects on ecosystems · Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology · Ecology

  • Resource Wars

    Open Access•N Fabricant•The Radical Teacher•2015

  • Focus on extreme events and the carbon cycle

    Open Access•Chuixiang Yi, Elise Pendall et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change

    Open Access•Eric A Davidson, Ivan A Janssens•Nature•2006

  • Analysis of Factors Controlling Soil Organic Matter Levels in Great Plains Grasslands

    Open Access•W J Parton, D S Schimel et al.•Soil Science Society of America…•1987

  • Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis

    Pierre Friedlingstein, Peter M Cox et al.•Journal of Climate•2006

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,18
Citation span2015 - 2015 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae