The Dynamics of Collaborative Emergency Capability
A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on Contingency Plans
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21738282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shuang Nie (0000-0001-6962-7707, Shanghai International Studies University), Bo Fan (0000-0003-1468-0695, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Natural Hazards Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1527-6988 • E-ISSN: 1527-6996 |
| Publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1645 |
| OpenAlex | W4323276487 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
The complex situations and chain effects of urban risk factors have resulted in a focus on improving emergency capability based on the importance of the collaborative governance network. This study constructed an integrated analysis framework to adapt to China’s emergency governance situation. This study aimed to contribute to the literature on collaborative emergency governance based on the framework of target capability by exploring the combination of risk warning, organization embedding, information sharing, resource integration, and business function as major influencing factors in the capability of collaborative emergency governance. Through a qualitative comparative analysis based on 50 contingency plans in Shanghai, China, and followup interviews, the study explored the multistructure equivalent causality and equivalent cause-and-effect chain in detail. The findings reveal three configuration paths for the generation of collaborative emergency capability: business-chain resource optimization, precontrol embedded system overlay, and balanced organizational embedding types. This research provides a theoretical reference and practical understanding of using “different routes to the same goal” in urban collaborative emergency governance
Business · Collaborative governance · Comparative case · Contingency · Corporate governance · Emergency management · Interdependence · Knowledge management · Political science · Process management · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Public Policy and Administration Research · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Understanding Compound, Interconnected, Interacting, and Cascading Risks
Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’
Understanding Multisector Stakeholder Value Dynamics in Hurricane Michael
Trust and emergency management
Balancing efficiency and resilience objectives in pursuit of sustainable infrastructure transformations
Building Collaborative Emergency Management Systems in Northeast Asia
Challenges and opportunities for pre-crisis emergency risk communication
Transnational public sector knowledge networks
Designing, Managing, and Sustaining Functionally Collaborative Emergency Management Networks
Understanding Multiplexity of Collaborative Emergency Management Networks
Foundations of Relating
Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street‐level bureaucrats' engagement in policy design
Building E uropean U nion capacity to manage transboundary crises
The New Ecology of Tornado Warning Information
The Dynamics of an Interorganizational Emergency Management Network
Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks
Emergency Management Research and Practice in Public Administration
Whoever Has Will be Given More
The Four Cs of disaster partnering
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |