Not the usual suspects
Creating the conditions for and implementing co-production with marginalised young people in Glasgow
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6113529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J B Cullingworth (0000-0002-2098-8074, University of Glasgow, corresponding author), Richard Brunner (0000-0003-1436-7404, University of Glasgow), N Watson (0000-0002-0364-427X, University of Glasgow) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 278-297 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-0767 • E-ISSN: 1749-4192 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09520767221140439 |
| OpenAlex | W4309756542 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 35 |
Co-production is now an established part of public service delivery. Despite its popularity, there is only a limited understanding about how co-production works in practice, particularly with marginalised groups. This paper identifies and explores insights from three case studies of a successful co-productive approach in Glasgow, Scotland. Operation Modulus is a criminal justice initiative involving public and third sector partners in the co-production of services with marginalised young people to reduce their involvement in crime and antisocial behaviour. The data highlighted the importance of leadership, the role of public service professionals and the process of working with marginalised young people; these are explored, all within the context of the authorising environment created at the level of a collaborative governance body. The findings underscore, first, the importance of distributed leadership and process in developing trust amongst partners and in turn in the relationships of partners with young people. Second, the essential role of effective co-management amongst service providers in creating the requisite conditions for meaningful co-production with marginalised citizens. Third, the potential for and importance of shared management to facilitate changes in professional relationships and ways of working, even if these do not lead to organisational systems change. Fourth, the significance of public service professionals having the authority and agency to explore collaborative ways of working
Business · Corporate governance · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economics · Political science · Popularity · Public relations · Public sector · Public service · Service delivery framework · Social science · Sociology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing
Co-mapping future scenarios and uncertainties amid climate crisis
Exploring the roles of non-profit organizations in co-production
What makes co-production sustainable? A comparative case study of three self-managed homeless programs
Conditions for involving vulnerable citizens in co-production
Understanding co-production with vulnerable populations
Trauma‐Informed Principles in Practice
Swedish municipalities’ local governance strategies in co-creating health promoting conditions for senior adults
Navigating co-production with disadvantaged service users
Innovating to amplify the voices of young people from marginalized ethnic migrant backgrounds
No two-party game
Exploring relationships between coproduction and service user outcomes
The Impact of Co-Production
Applied Thematic Analysis
Why People Co-Produce
Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage
Public Leadership
Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services
Young People as Co‐producers in Policing across England. An Evaluation of the ‘Youth Commission’ on Police and Crime
Partners in Power
The politics of co-production
The Co-production of a Community
Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe
Administrative Leadership Theory
Co-production in healthcare
Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings
Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction
Varieties of Participation in Public Services
Revisiting Lipsky
Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services
Beyond Engagement and Participation
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
Asylum Seekers and the Co-production of Public Services
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 11 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |