Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Not the usual suspects

Creating the conditions for and implementing co-production with marginalised young people in Glasgow

Bibliographic Data

ID6113529
AuthorsJ B Cullingworth (0000-0002-2098-8074, University of Glasgow, corresponding author), Richard Brunner (0000-0003-1436-7404, University of Glasgow), N Watson (0000-0002-0364-427X, University of Glasgow)
Year2024
Volume39
Issue2
Pages278-297
Publication date2024-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0952-0767 • E-ISSN: 1749-4192
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/09520767221140439
OpenAlexW4309756542
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited35

Co-production is now an established part of public service delivery. Despite its popularity, there is only a limited understanding about how co-production works in practice, particularly with marginalised groups. This paper identifies and explores insights from three case studies of a successful co-productive approach in Glasgow, Scotland. Operation Modulus is a criminal justice initiative involving public and third sector partners in the co-production of services with marginalised young people to reduce their involvement in crime and antisocial behaviour. The data highlighted the importance of leadership, the role of public service professionals and the process of working with marginalised young people; these are explored, all within the context of the authorising environment created at the level of a collaborative governance body. The findings underscore, first, the importance of distributed leadership and process in developing trust amongst partners and in turn in the relationships of partners with young people. Second, the essential role of effective co-management amongst service providers in creating the requisite conditions for meaningful co-production with marginalised citizens. Third, the potential for and importance of shared management to facilitate changes in professional relationships and ways of working, even if these do not lead to organisational systems change. Fourth, the significance of public service professionals having the authority and agency to explore collaborative ways of working

Business · Corporate governance · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economics · Political science · Popularity · Public relations · Public sector · Public service · Service delivery framework · Social science · Sociology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing

  • Co-mapping future scenarios and uncertainties amid climate crisis

    Open Access•Jiayi Jin, Raechel Laing et al.•Journal of Urban Management•2026

  • Exploring the roles of non-profit organizations in co-production

    Chengzhi Yi, Xinyi Qiu et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • What makes co-production sustainable? A comparative case study of three self-managed homeless programs

    Open Access•Menno Hoppen, Max Huber et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • Conditions for involving vulnerable citizens in co-production

    Open Access•Menno Hoppen, Taco Brandsen et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • Understanding co-production with vulnerable populations

    Open Access•Angelica Zazzera, Denita Cepiku•Public Management Review•2026

  • Trauma‐Informed Principles in Practice

    Open Access•Tracey Stone, Emily Eyles et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Swedish municipalities’ local governance strategies in co-creating health promoting conditions for senior adults

    Open Access•Anna Williamsson, Lotta Dellve•Public Policy and Administration•2025

  • Navigating co-production with disadvantaged service users

    Open Access•Kate Broadhurst, Steven Parker•Public Policy and Administration•2025

  • Innovating to amplify the voices of young people from marginalized ethnic migrant backgrounds

    Open Access•Kelsey L Deane, John Fenaughty et al.•American Journal of Community…•2025

  • No two-party game

    Maria Tiggelaar, Bert George•Public Management Review•2025

  • Exploring relationships between coproduction and service user outcomes

    Open Access•Elizabeth Sanderson•Public Policy and Administration•2025

  • The Impact of Co-Production

    Open Access•Aksel Ersoy•The Impact of Co-Production•2017

  • Applied Thematic Analysis

    Greg Guest, Kathleen Macqueen et al.•Applied Thematic Analysis•2012

  • Why People Co-Produce

    Carola Van Eijk, C J A van Eijk et al.•Public Management Review•2014

  • Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage

    Open Access•Siv Vangen, Chris Huxham•British Journal of Management•2003

  • Public Leadership

    Rick Vogel, Doris Masal•Public Management Review•2015

  • Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services

    Taco Brandsen, Victor Pestoff•Public Management Review•2006

  • Young People as Co‐producers in Policing across England. An Evaluation of the ‘Youth Commission’ on Police and Crime

    Open Access•Samantha Burns•Children & Society•2019

  • Partners in Power

    Open Access•Tom Cockburn•Children & Society•2007

  • The politics of co-production

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Tamara Metze et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • The Co-production of a Community

    Open Access•Daphne Vanleene, Joris Voets et al.•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2017

  • Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe

    Open Access•Victor Pestoff•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2012

  • Administrative Leadership Theory

    Open Access•Montgomery Van Wart•Public Administration•2013

  • Co-production in healthcare

    Open Access•Femke Vennik, Femke D Vennik et al.•International Review of…•2015

  • Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings

    Open Access•Mariafrancesca Sicilia, Enrico Guarini et al.•International Review of…•2016

  • Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction

    Open Access•Taco Brandsen, Marlies Honingh•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Varieties of Participation in Public Services

    Open Access•Tina Nabatchi, Alessandro Sancino et al.•Public Administration Review•2017

  • Revisiting Lipsky

    Open Access•Catherine Durose•Political Studies•2011

  • Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services

    Open Access•Elke Loeffler, Peter Timm-Arnold•Public Policy and Administration•2021

  • Beyond Engagement and Participation

    Open Access•T Bovaird•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Qualitative Inquiry•2006

  • Asylum Seekers and the Co-production of Public Services

    Open Access•Kirsty Strokosch, Stephen P Osborne•Journal of Social Policy•2016

Unique citing works11
Citations per year11
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae