Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Visual cues during interaction

Are recasts different from noncorrective repetition

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11655877
AutoresKim Mcdonough (0000-0003-3165-9687, Concordia University, autor de correspondencia), Pavel Trofimovich (0000-0001-6696-2411, Concordia University), Libing Lu (Concordia University), Dato Abashidze (0000-0002-1304-7356, Leibniz-Centre for General Linguistics, Germany; Concordia University, Canada)
Año2020
Volumen36
Número3
Páginas359-370
Fecha de publicación2020-03-23
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSecond language Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0267-6583 • E-ISSN: 1477-0326
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0267658320914962
OpenAlexW3012970202
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas24

Visual cues may help second language (L2) speakers perceive interactional feedback and reformulate their nontarget forms, particularly when paired with recasts, as recasts can be difficult to perceive as corrective. This study explores whether recasts have a visual signature and whether raters can perceive a recast’s corrective function. Transcripts of conversations between a bilingual French–English interlocutor and L2 English university students ( n = 24) were analysed for recasts and noncorrective repetitions with rising and declarative intonation. Videos of those excerpts ( k = 96) were then analysed for the interlocutor’s provision of visual cues during the recast and repetition turns, including eye gaze duration, nods, blinks, and other facial expressions (frowns, eyebrow raises). The videos were rated by 96 undergraduate university students who were randomly assigned to three viewing conditions: clear voice/clear face, clear voice/blurred face, or distorted voice/clear face. Using a 100-millimeter scale with two anchor points (0% = he’s making a comment, and 100% = he’s correcting an error), they rated the corrective function of the interlocutors’ responses while their eye gaze was tracked. Raters reliably distinguished recasts from repetitions through their ratings (although they were generally low), but not through their eye gaze behaviors

Cognitive psychology · Corrective Feedback · Eye tracking · Fluency · Gaze · Intonation (linguistics · Linguistics · Repetition (rhetorical device · Communication · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology

  • Examining Rater Perception of Holds as a Visual Cue of Listener Nonunderstanding

    Open Access•Kim Mcdonough, Rachel Lindberg et al.•Studies in Second Language…•2022

  • Exploring the depths of second language processing with eye tracking

    Open Access•Aline Godfroid, Paula Winke et al.•Second language Research•2020

  • The visual signature of non-understanding

    Open Access•Kim Mcdonough, Rachel Lindberg et al.•Language Teaching•2023

  • Input, Interaction, and Second Language Development

    Open Access•Alison Mackey•Studies in Second Language…•1999

  • Recasts, Repetition, and Ambiguity in L2 Classroom Discourse

    Open Access•Roy Lyster•Studies in Second Language…•1998

  • What speakers do and what addressees look at

    Marianne Gullberg, Kenneth Holmqvist•Pragmatics & Cognition•2006

  • Listener Responses as a Collaborative Process

    Open Access•Janet Beavin Bavelas, Linda Coates et al.•Journal of Communication•2002

  • Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research

    Open Access•Marianne Gullberg•Second language Research•2010

  • Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts

    Open Access•Kim Mcdonough, Dustin Crowther et al.•Second language Research•2015

  • Eye gaze and L2 speakers’ responses to recasts

    Open Access•Kim Mcdonough, Pavel Trofimovich et al.•Language Teaching•2020

  • Timing of Visual Bodily Behavior in Repair Sequences

    Open Access•Simeon Floyd, Elizabeth Manrique et al.•Discourse Processes•2016

  • Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom

    Iliana Panova, Roy Lyster•TESOL Quarterly•2002

  • Paralinguistic Focus on Form

    Matthew Davies, M Frances Davies•TESOL Quarterly•2006

  • Hearing and Seeing Tone Through Color

    Open Access•Aline Godfroid, Chin‐hsi Lin et al.•Language Learning•2017

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2023 (4)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae