A refresher in research publication ethics
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15096072 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Allison Hodge (0000-0001-5464-2197), Agneta Yngve (0000-0002-7165-279X, Health Affairs), IRJA HAAPALA (0000-0001-5624-3018), Geraldine McNeill (0000-0003-0373-650X), Marilyn Tseng (0000-0002-9969-9055) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 377-378 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-01-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s136898001200002x |
| PMID | 22280824 |
| OpenAlex | W2065711261 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
Getting a research paper published in a peer-reviewed journal may seem like a daunting and never-ending task but, in the end, it is the peer-review process that ensures good research practice. Guidelines for good research practice are, as a rule, available at the national level, issued by the national Advisory Board/Committee on Research Ethics (for example, in Australia, these are available from the National Health and Medical Research Council Ethically acceptable, reliable and credible research must conform to guidelines on good research practice. Ethics in the process of getting the research published are also covered in the same guidelines and, from the publisher's point of view, are regularly discussed in the meetings held by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), open to all members, editors and publishers
Physics · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Mathematics · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |