Proposals for person‐centred care in the Covid‐19 era. Delphi study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19508985
AutoresJosé Joaquín Mira (0000-0001-6497-083X, Departamento de Salud Alicante‐Sant Joan Grupo Atenea FISABIO Alicante Spain, autor de correspondencia), Martin Blanco (Consultor en ámbito sanitario y de la sostenibilidad justa Madrid Spain), M Diez Blanco (Comunidad de Madrid), Kamila Cheikh‐Moussa (0000-0002-1561-6903, Departamento de Salud Alicante‐Sant Joan Grupo Atenea FISABIO Alicante Spain), Olga Solas (0000-0002-0918-5051, Consultora en políticas públicas Toledo Spain), Aquilino Alonso (Área de Servicios Públicos Supramunicipales Diputación Provincial de Sevilla Sevilla Spain), Rodrigo Gutiérrez (0000-0002-6736-3418, Sociedad Española de Atención al Usuario de la Sanidad Barcelona Spain), Rodrigo A Gutiérrez (0000-0002-5961-5005, Sociedad Española de Nefrología), Celia J Gomez (Servicio Cántabro de Salud), Celia Gomez (Servicio Cántabro de Salud Santander Spain), Mercedes Guilabert (0000-0002-0706-9911, Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Alicante Spain)
Año2021
Volumen24
Número2
Páginas687-699
Fecha de publicación2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13218
PMID33639043
OpenAlexW3135177064
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas20

BACKGROUND: In this COVID-19 era, we need to rethink the criteria used to measure the results of person-centred care strategies. OBJECTIVE: To identify priorities, and criteria that health services can use to pursue actually the goal of achieving person-centred care. DESIGN: Three-phase online qualitative study performed during May-July of 2020 using the Delphi technique. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An online platform was used for a consensus meeting of 114 participants, including health planning experts, health-care institution managers, clinicians and patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Criteria and indicators for the achievement of person-centred care. MAIN RESULTS: The first round began with 125 proposals and 11 dimensions. After the second round, 28 ideas reached a high level of consensus among the participants. Ultimately, the workgroup agreed on 20 criteria for goals in the implementation of person-centred care during the COVID-19 era and 21 related indicators to measure goal achievement. DISCUSSION: Nine dimensions and 28 priorities were identified. These priorities are also in accordance with the quadruple aim approach, which emphasizes the need for care for health-care professionals, without whom it is impossible to achieve a better quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Person-centred care continues to be a key objective. However, new metrics are needed to ensure its continued development during the restoration of public health services beyond the control of COVID-19. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Twelve professionals and patient representatives participated voluntarily in the construction of the baseline questionnaire and in the selection of the criteria and indicators using an online platform for consensus meetings

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Data science · Delphi · Delphi method · Disease · MEDLINE · Pandemic · Political science · Computer Science · Delphi Technique in Research · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Virology