Open Science in Education Sciences
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21349910 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Wilhelmina Van Dijk (0000-0001-9195-8772, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA, autor de correspondencia), Christopher Schatschneider (0000-0002-1700-7685, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA), Shilpa A Hart (0000-0001-9793-0420, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 54 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 139-152 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Learning Disabilities (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-2194 • E-ISSN: 1538-4780 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022219420945267 |
| PMID | 32734821 |
| OpenAlex | W3046463326 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 15 |
| Referencias citadas | 50 |
The Open Science movement has gained considerable traction in the last decade. The Open Science movement tries to increase trust in research results and open the access to all elements of a research project to the public. Central to these goals, Open Science has promoted five critical tenets: Open Data, Open Analysis, Open Materials, Preregistration, and Open Access. All Open Science elements can be thought of as extensions to the traditional way of achieving openness in science, which has been scientific publication of research outcomes in journals or books. Open Science in education sciences, however, has the potential to be much more than a safeguard against questionable research. Open Science in education science provides opportunities to (a) increase the transparency and therefore replicability of research and (b) develop and answer research questions about individuals with learning disabilities and learning difficulties that were previously impossible to answer due to complexities in data analysis methods. We will provide overviews of the main tenets of Open Science (i.e., Open Data, Open Analysis, Open Materials, Preregistration, and Open Access), show how they are in line with grant funding agencies’ expectations for rigorous research processes, and present resources on best practices for each of the tenets
Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Science education · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Online Learning and Analytics · Open Education and E-Learning · Psychology
Using measurement alignment in research on adolescence involving multiple groups
Adaptive reorganization in knowledge building research (2014–2025)
A systematic review of transparency in Lesson Study research
Reading gains and gaps
School-based interventions for primary and secondary school students with intellectual disability
A How-to Guide for Open-Science Practices in Special Education Research
Special Education Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Use of Open Practices
Introduction to the Special Series
Open Access in Special Education
Registered Reports in Special Education
Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts
Education researchers’ beliefs and barriers towards data sharing
Data Sharing for Randomized Controlled Trials in Social Work
Improving executive function during toddlerhood
Policy and practice innovations in school-based mental health services
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education
Epidemiology Faces Its Limits
Integrative data analysis
The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education
Scientific Utopia
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
False-Positive Psychology
Social Science Data Archives
Open Communication Science
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics
Economics and Technology
Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template
Intervention for First Graders With Limited Number Knowledge
Qualitative Studies in Special Education
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 15 |