Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research
Datos Bibliográficos
Equitable health research requires actively engaging communities in producing new knowledge to advocate for their health needs. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) relies on the coproduction of contextual and grounded knowledge between researchers, programme implementers and community partners with the aim of catalysing action for change. Improving coproduction competencies can support research quality and validity. Yet, frameworks and guidance highlighting the ideal competencies and conditions needed for all research partners to contribute meaningfully and equitably are lacking. This paper aims to advance CBPR by laying out seven core competencies and conditions that can promote power sharing in knowledge production, application and dissemination at the individual, community, organisational and systems levels. Competencies were developed through an iterative process, that synthesised pre-existing literature and frameworks with a wide range of tacit knowledge from researchers, activists, implementation partners and community researchers from Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Sierra Leone and the UK. The seven core competencies and conditions are: (1) capacity to interpret and respond to individual and relational identity, connection, uniqueness and inequities; (2) ability of communities and partners to work in the most suitable, inclusive and synergistic way; (3) aptitude for generating safe and inclusive spaces for multidirectional knowledge and skills exchange that goes beyond the research focus; (4) expertise in democratic leadership and/or facilitation to balance competing priorities and ensure shared decision-making; (5) capacity to analyse readiness for action, successes and areas for improvements throughout the research process; (6) ability to instigate sustainable change processes within the political dimensions of systems, policies and practices using advocacy, lobbying or activism approaches and (7) skills to interpret and disseminate findings and outputs that are understandable, respectful and promote community ownership. We present core competency and condition areas, individual and collective expertise associated with competencies, likely outcomes, examples of activities and sources of evidence
Action research · Community-based participatory research · Coproduction · Deliberation · Knowledge management · Participatory action research · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Co‐Producing Training Resources to Improve Healthcare Experiences for Young Women and Reduce Gendered Health Inequalities
Community and Participatory Evidence and Research Synthesis
Intersectional experiences of non-communicable diseases and health seeking strategies in informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone
Deconstructing the concept of participation in participatory health research
The Ugandan youth public health ambassador program
Healthcare in the Margins
Changing habits of mind
Complicity or accountability? The limits of positionality statements
Cultivating Authentic Partnership
Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation
Researcher Positionality - A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research - A New Researcher Guide
Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review
The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research
Reflexivity in research
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research
Implications of Covid-19 for safeguarding in international development research
Barriers to decolonising educational partnerships in global health
How to prevent and address safeguarding concerns in global health research programmes
A pragmatic approach to equitable global health partnerships in academic health sciences
‘You want to deal with power while riding on power’
Engage for Equity
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research
A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on
Informing ‘good’ global health research partnerships
Participatory Democracy, Community Organizing and the Community Assessment of Freeway Exposure and Health (Cafeh) Partnership
Understanding community-based participatory research through a social movement framework
Implementing Community-Based Participatory Research Centers in Diverse Urban Settings
Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability
What is a planning model? An introduction to PRECEDE‐PROCEED
Development and Evaluation of a Toolkit to Assess Partnership Readiness for Community-Based Participatory Research
A Picture’s Worth a Thousand Words
I Know What CBPR Is, Now What Do I Do?”
Improving Accountability for Equitable Health and Well-being in Urban Informal Spaces
Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Issues in Measuring the Benefits of Public Participation
Using participatory and creative methods to facilitate emancipatory research with people facing multiple disadvantage
Exploratory research
Tackling the tensions in evaluating capacity strengthening for health research in low- and middle-income countries
Guiding principles for quality, ethical standards and ongoing learning in implementation research
Inequality, Power and Participation – Revisiting the Links
Structural Community Governance
Community-Based Participatory Research
Community-based participatory research (CBPR)
Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency
The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research
What is Social Learning
Empowerment examined
Insider-outsider as process
Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 9 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |