Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Putting the Other Side “On Notice” Can Induce Compliance in Arms Control

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6284628
AutoresD Marc Kilgour (0000-0001-8810-8937, Wilfrid Laurier University), Steven J Bram (0000-0003-3650-0392, New York University), Steven J Brams (New York University)
Año1992
Volumen36
Número3
Páginas395-414
Fecha de publicación1992-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022002792036003001
OpenAlexW2075772193
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas6

Arms-control inspection is modeled by two games, one played simultaneously and one sequentially, between an inspector (O) and an inspectee (E). In each game, E may choose to comply with or violate an arms-control agreement and O may choose to inspect, or not, for a possible violation by E. Besides various costs and benefits, the parameters of the games include the conditional probability that a violation will be detected if there is an inspection, reflecting the uncertainty of inspection. In the simultaneous game, O and E make simultaneous choices. Because none of the three possible equilibria involves certain compliance by E, O is not always able to deter E from violating an agreement. In the sequential game, by contrast, O, by announcing in advance an inspection strategy and credibly committing itself to carrying it out, can, with certainty, deter E from violating, which in general leads to an equilibrium in the sequential form Pareto-superior to that in the simultaneous form. Thus there are evident benefits for both O and E when O “moves” first, given that its detection probability is above a certain threshold. Policy implications of this finding, especially in regional conflicts today, are briefly discussed

Arms control · Certainty · Compliance (psychology · Control (management · Economics · Game theory · Law and economics · Mathematical economics · Notice · Operations management · Pareto principle · Political science · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Game Theory and Applications · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Studying small states in international security affairs

    Diana Panke•Cambridge Review of International…•2017

  • Targeted Versus Conventional Economic Sanctions

    Cristiane Lucena Carneiro, Laerte Apolinário•International Interactions•2015

  • Deterrence Theory Discussion

    Open Access•Barry O’neill, Barry O'Neill•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1992

  • Great-Power Cooperation under Conditions of Limited Reciprocity

    Joshua S Goldstein•International Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Engineering Cooperation

    Catherine C Langlois, Jean-Pierre P Langlois•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Mixed Strategies in the Mugging Game

    Open Access•Robert Hoffmann•Rationality and Society•2001

  • Non-Cooperative Games

    John F Nash, John Nash•Annals of Mathematics•1951

  • Game theory and national security

    Ian Bellany•International Affairs•1990

  • Arms Control Verification and Other Games Involving Imperfect Detection

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•American Political Science Review•1989

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año0,18
Intervalo de citas1992 - 2017 (26)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae