Social Science and the Courts
Challenges and Strategies for Bridging Gaps Between Law and Research
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9732148 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Julie Margetta Morgan (autor de correspondencia), Diana Pullin |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 39 |
| Número | 7 |
| Páginas | 515-524 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Editorial | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x10383334 |
| OpenAlex | W2083855115 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
Social scientists collect vital information that bears on issues of education policy. When the courts are faced with an opportunity to make a decision that shapes education, judges need access to high-quality research, but they must also be convinced that it can be useful in their decision making. This article approaches the question of how social science can be made more effective in judicial decision making. The authors examine the use of social science evidence by the courts and the theories of jurisprudence that bear on its effectiveness. As an example of the difficulty of influencing the outcome of a case, they review the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision involving the use of race in school assignments in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
Judicial opinion · Jurisprudence · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Race (biology · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal Issues in Education
An examination of the bidirectional relationship between federal civil rights guidance and research
The restroom and locker room wars
A Call for Amicus Briefs as a Means to Influence Special Education Policy
A Mere Footnote? An American Dilemma and Supreme Court School Desegregation Jurisprudence
Toward a Synergistic Model for Improving the Use of Research in Court-Driven Educational Reform
Balancing Liberty and Equality
Critical Mass Revisited
Reflections on a Collaboration
Boundary Crossing Between Academia and Law
Scholars as Policy Actors
The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
The United States Arms the Settlers?
Organized psychology's efforts to influence judicial policy-making
Psychologists as law professors
Between the Lines
Reforming the Law
The Courts and Social Policy
Theme Issue
Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
The Life of the Law
The Effects of Segregation and the Consequences of Desegregation
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2011 - 2021 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |