James P Begin
Biographic Data
| ID | 1052197 |
|---|---|
| NAME | James P Begin |
| GIVEN NAMES | James P |
| FAMILY NAME | Begin |
| SIGNATURE | BEGIN J P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 13 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1970 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1991 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations
Statutory Definitions of the Scope of Negotiations: The Implications for Traditional Faculty Governance
Additional informationNotes on contributorsJames P. BeginJames P. Begin is professor and chairperson, Department of Research, Institute of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University
Governance in Institutions with Faculty Unions: Six Case Studies
Grievance Mechanisms and Faculty Collegiality: The Rutgers Case
Investigates the impact of the introduction of collective bargaining on collegial decision-making processes within a university. Analysis of a period of experience at Rutgers University in Camden, New Jersey under an American Association of University Professors collective bargaining agreement; Scope and methodology; Criteria to test for due process in pre- and post-bargaining grievance mechanisms; Findings. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Faculty Governance and Collective Bargaining: An Early Appraisal
A common generalization concerning the impact of faculty bargaining has been that traditional modes of faculty participation, particularly the institution-wide or system-wide governing bodies, will deteriorate in competition with the collective bargaining process. This paper examines the developing interactions between bargaining agents, senates, and administrations at four-year institutions bargaining for the longest period of time, and suggests…
The Structure and Scope of Appeals Procedures for Public Employees
Examines the structure and scope of public sector appeals procedures and compares them with private sector procedures. Overview of public sector appeals procedures; Criteria for evaluating grievance procedures; Extent of grievance arbitration. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Governance in Institutions with Faculty Unions: Six Case Studies
Grievance Mechanisms and Faculty Collegiality: The Rutgers Case
Investigates the impact of the introduction of collective bargaining on collegial decision-making processes within a university. Analysis of a period of experience at Rutgers University in Camden, New Jersey under an American Association of University Professors collective bargaining agreement; Scope and methodology; Criteria to test for due process in pre- and post-bargaining grievance mechanisms; Findings. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Faculty Governance and Collective Bargaining: An Early Appraisal
A common generalization concerning the impact of faculty bargaining has been that traditional modes of faculty participation, particularly the institution-wide or system-wide governing bodies, will deteriorate in competition with the collective bargaining process. This paper examines the developing interactions between bargaining agents, senates, and administrations at four-year institutions bargaining for the longest period of time, and suggests…
Statutory Definitions of the Scope of Negotiations: The Implications for Traditional Faculty Governance
Additional informationNotes on contributorsJames P. BeginJames P. Begin is professor and chairperson, Department of Research, Institute of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University
The Structure and Scope of Appeals Procedures for Public Employees
Examines the structure and scope of public sector appeals procedures and compares them with private sector procedures. Overview of public sector appeals procedures; Criteria for evaluating grievance procedures; Extent of grievance arbitration. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Faculty Governance and Collective Bargaining: An Early Appraisal
A common generalization concerning the impact of faculty bargaining has been that traditional modes of faculty participation, particularly the institution-wide or system-wide governing bodies, will deteriorate in competition with the collective bargaining process. This paper examines the developing interactions between bargaining agents, senates, and administrations at four-year institutions bargaining for the longest period of time, and suggests…
Statutory Definitions of the Scope of Negotiations: The Implications for Traditional Faculty Governance
Additional informationNotes on contributorsJames P. BeginJames P. Begin is professor and chairperson, Department of Research, Institute of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University
Governance in Institutions with Faculty Unions: Six Case Studies
Grievance Mechanisms and Faculty Collegiality: The Rutgers Case
Investigates the impact of the introduction of collective bargaining on collegial decision-making processes within a university. Analysis of a period of experience at Rutgers University in Camden, New Jersey under an American Association of University Professors collective bargaining agreement; Scope and methodology; Criteria to test for due process in pre- and post-bargaining grievance mechanisms; Findings. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations
Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Business (4 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Accounting (3 works) · Accounting (3 works) · Corporate governance (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Management (3 works)