A Lind

Biographic Data

ID	23227
NAME	A Lind
GIVEN NAMES	A
FAMILY NAME	Lind
SIGNATURE	LIND A
AFFILIATIONS	Duke University
ORCID	0000-0001-8625-8886
VERIFIED	Yes
TOTAL WORKS	41
TOTAL CITATIONS	783
AUTHOR COUNT	41
EDITOR COUNT	0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR	1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR	2023
H-INDEX	15

An Eco-linguistic Study on Linguistic Realizations and Metaphors of Marbija Ceremony in the Simalungun Ethnic Community in Indonesia
Open AccessBernieke Anggita, Ristia Damanik et al.ARTICLEInternational Society for the…2023
Marbija is a ceremony performed by the Simalungun ethnic community since the ancient times to ascertain if someone is telling the truth or not. In it, linguistic realizations and metaphor describe the relationship between people and their environment. This has made the people in Indonesia become aware that this phenomenon is inseparable from the culture that exists within the community itself. This study investigates linguistic realizations and m…
Focusing on the “Social” in Social Justice Research
Open AccessA LindARTICLESocial Justice Research2023
Perceived Organizational Justice in Care Services: Creation and multi-sample validation of a measure
Open AccessDiana Pérez-Arechaederra, Elena Briones et al.ARTICLESocial Science & Medicine2014Cited by: 3References: 32
On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: Because of the prosocial nature of people, behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve
Kees Van Den Bos, Paul A M Van Lange et al.ARTICLEJournal of Personality and Social…2011Cited by: 7
This article focuses on social situations in which people are surprised about what is happening and inhibited about how to respond to the situation at hand. We study these situations by examining a classic topic in social psychology: how people respond to receiving better outcomes than are deserved. In these situations, the actions of an authority or a coworker push in the direction of accepting and enjoying the unfair outcome, whereas personal v…
Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process
Open AccessKees Van Den Bos, Jaap Ham et al.ARTICLEJournal of Experimental Social…2007Cited by: 15References: 49
Extending theory within the justice domain and work on the human alarm system, the current paper argues that the process by which justice judgments are formed may be influenced reliably by the activation of psychological systems that people use to detect and handle alarming situations. Building on this analysis, it is further proposed that if this line of reasoning is true then presenting alarm-related stimuli, such as exclamation points and flas…
Realpolitik versus fair process: Moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions
Kwok Leung, Kwok-Kit Tong et al.ARTICLEJournal of Personality and Social…2007Cited by: 16
Three studies examined the effects of perceived procedural justice and the favorability of a group-level outcome on the endorsement of a group-level decision and the evaluation of the authority responsible for the decision. Results showed that, contrary to findings usually seen with individual-level decisions, collective outcome favorability was more important than procedural justice in influencing the endorsement of the decision. Furthermore, in…
How do people react to negative procedures? On the moderating role of authority’s biased attitudes
Open AccessJan-Willem Van Prooijen, Kees Van Den Bos et al.ARTICLEJournal of Experimental Social…2005Cited by: 9References: 35
Fairness heuristic theory is an empirical framework: A reply to Árnadóttir
Open AccessKees Van Den Bos, A Lind et al.ARTICLEScandinavian Journal of Psychology2004
In this article on fairness heuristic theory, we point out some important flaws in Árnadóttir's (2002) claim that fairness heuristic theory is “not empirical,” by which Árnadóttir meant that theory's predictions are knowable a priori , and are not contingent upon circumstances. To this end, we demonstrate that empirically testing effects predicted by fairness heuristic theory was and is important because this showed that the theory's propositions…
When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management
Open AccessA Lind, E Allan Lind et al.ARTICLEResearch in Organizational Behavior2002
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
Kees Van Den Bos, A Lind et al.CHAPTERAdvances in Experimental Social…2002
Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures
T R Tyler, A Lind et al.ARTICLEPsychology Public Policy and Law2000Cited by: 1
Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures
T R Tyler, A Lind et al.ARTICLEPsychology Public Policy and Law2000Cited by: 20References: 32
The findings of 4 studies suggest that cultural values about power distance influence the way that people react to third-party authorities in a manner predicted by the relational model of authority (T. R. Tyler & E. A. Lind, 1992). Power-distance values reflect beliefs about the appropriate power relationship between authorities and their subordinates. As predicted, when making evaluations of authorities, those lower in their power-distance value…
The Two Psychologies of Conflict Resolution: Differing Antecedents of Pre-Experience Choices and Post-Experience Evaluations
Open AccessT R Tyler, Yuen J Huo et al.ARTICLEGroup Processes & Intergroup…1999Cited by: 6References: 7
The literature on the `myth of self-interest' model of perceived human motivation suggests that people believe that both they and others are more motivated by self-interest than is actually the case. Four studies are reported which test one implication of the myth of self-interest: the psychology of pre-experience preferences and post-experience evaluations will differ. We hypothesize that people arrive at pre-experience preferences for decision-…
Cohesion and Respect: An Examination of Group Decision Making in Social and Escalation Dilemmas
Open AccessLeigh Thompson, Laura J Kray et al.ARTICLEJournal of Experimental Social…1998Cited by: 4References: 29
The Self-Relevant Implications of the Group-Value Model: Group Membership, Self-Worth, and Treatment Quality
Open AccessHeather J Smith, T R Tyler et al.ARTICLEJournal of Experimental Social…1998Cited by: 77References: 27
When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority
Kees Van Den Bos, Henk A M Wilke et al.ARTICLEJournal of Personality and Social…1998Cited by: 49
On the basis of fairness heuristic theory, the authors argue that when information about whether an authority can be trusted is not available, people will resolve the question of how they should interpret the decisions of the authority by relying on perceived procedural fairness. As a consequence, people who do not have information about authority's trustworthiness react more positively toward the outcomes of authority's decisions if the authorit…
Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments
Kees Van Den Bos, Henk A M Wilke et al.ARTICLEJournal of Personality and Social…1998Cited by: 42
The authors refine and extend their explanation of the psychology of the fair process effect (the positive influence of procedural fairness on outcome evaluations). On the basis of fairness heuristic theory's substitutability proposition, the authors predicted and found that outcome evaluations show strong effects of procedural fairness when outcomes are better or worse than expected, whereas less strong fair process effects appear when outcomes …
Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments
A Lind, E Allan Lind et al.ARTICLEJournal of Personality and Social…1997Cited by: 30
Twenty-five years ago the social psychological study of procedural justice judgments began with the discovery that different dispute resolution procedures engender quite different fairness judgments, regardless of the outcome of the dispute. John Thibaut, Laurens Walker, and their students found that disputing procedures that grant disputants the opportunity to express their views and argue their case are seen as fairer than procedures that deny …
How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect
Kees Van Den Bos, A Lind et al.ARTICLEJournal of Personality and Social…1997Cited by: 76
Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice
Open AccessCarol T Kulik, A Lind et al.ARTICLESocial Justice Research1997
The meaning of procedural fairness: A comparison of taxpayers' and representatives' views of their tax audits
Open AccessLoretta J Stalans, Loretta Stalans et al.ARTICLESocial Justice Research1997Cited by: 5References: 10
Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer
Open AccessYuen J Huo, Heather J Smith et al.ARTICLEPsychological Science1996
The diversity of American society raises concerns about whether authorities can maintain social cohesion amid competing interests and values The group-value model of justice suggests that authorities function more effectively when they are perceived as fair (e g, benevolent, neutral, and respectful) However, such relational evaluations may be effective only if authorities represent a group with which people identify In a diverse society, subgroup…
The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest
Open AccessRiël Vermunt, Arjaan Wit et al.ARTICLESocial Justice Research1996Cited by: 12References: 12
Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice
Open AccessCarol T Kulik, A Lind et al.ARTICLESocial Justice Research1996Cited by: 5References: 34
A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
T R Tyler, A Lind et al.CHAPTERAdvances in experimental social…1992