Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Paul J Barber

Biographic Data

ID5710320
NAMEPaul J Barber
GIVEN NAMESPaul J
FAMILY NAMEBarber
SIGNATUREBARBER P J
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR3
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1978
H-INDEX0
  • Perception and Information

    E Bruce Goldstein, Paul Barber et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

  • Experimenter bias against subliminal perception? A rejoinder

    Open Access•Paul Barber, Paul J Barber•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•1977

    The basis for Spence & Smith's (1977) critique of three replications of subliminal perception experiments is judged to be conjectural. The case that the replications were less sensitive to subliminal perception effects than the original experiments is evaluated and rebutted

  • Experimenter Bias and Subliminal Perception

    Open Access•Paul Barber, Paul J Barber et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•1975

    It has been suggested that subliminal perception phenomena may be in part due to experimenter bias effects. Two studies that obtained positive evidence of subliminal perception were therefore replicated with experimenters tested under blind and not blind conditions. There was only marginal support for the subliminal perception hypothesis and, although there were fairly clear indications of diffuse experimenter effects, the evidence for the experi…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Experimenter Bias and Subliminal Perception

    Open Access•Paul Barber, Paul J Barber et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•1975

    It has been suggested that subliminal perception phenomena may be in part due to experimenter bias effects. Two studies that obtained positive evidence of subliminal perception were therefore replicated with experimenters tested under blind and not blind conditions. There was only marginal support for the subliminal perception hypothesis and, although there were fairly clear indications of diffuse experimenter effects, the evidence for the experi…

  • Experimenter bias against subliminal perception? A rejoinder

    Open Access•Paul Barber, Paul J Barber•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•1977

    The basis for Spence & Smith's (1977) critique of three replications of subliminal perception experiments is judged to be conjectural. The case that the replications were less sensitive to subliminal perception effects than the original experiments is evaluated and rebutted

  • Perception and Information

    E Bruce Goldstein, Paul Barber et al.•ARTICLE•Leonardo•1978

Neuroscience (3 works) · Perception (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Cognitive psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Subliminal stimuli (2 works) · Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 works) · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (1 work) · Cognitive science (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae