Experimenter Bias and Subliminal Perception
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9620648 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Barber (0000-0002-5053-9659, Birkbeck, University of London), Paul J Barber, J Philippe Rushton (York University) |
| Year | 1975 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 357-372 |
| Publication date | 1975-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01472.x |
| PMID | 1182403 |
| OpenAlex | W2124167618 |
| Language | EN |
It has been suggested that subliminal perception phenomena may be in part due to experimenter bias effects. Two studies that obtained positive evidence of subliminal perception were therefore replicated with experimenters tested under blind and not blind conditions. There was only marginal support for the subliminal perception hypothesis and, although there were fairly clear indications of diffuse experimenter effects, the evidence for the experimenter bias explanation of subliminal perception was not strong. The need for more extensive replications of subliminal perception researches is noted. It is argued that the experimenter bias hypothesis lacks detail and generality; it is essential for it to be examined in the context of theoretically substantial issues
Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology) · Generality · Perception · Response bias · Subliminal stimuli · Face Recognition and Perception · Neuroscience · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Visual perception and processing mechanisms
| Highly cited | No |
|---|