Experimenter bias against subliminal perception? A rejoinder
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9620336 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Barber (0000-0002-5053-9659, corresponding author), Paul J Barber |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 281-282 |
| Publication date | 1977-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01590.x |
| PMID | 890215 |
| OpenAlex | W1970074461 |
| Language | EN |
The basis for Spence & Smith's (1977) critique of three replications of subliminal perception experiments is judged to be conjectural. The case that the replications were less sensitive to subliminal perception effects than the original experiments is evaluated and rebutted
Cognitive psychology · Perception · Subliminal stimuli · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Psychology · Visual perception and processing mechanisms
| Highly cited | No |
|---|