Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Daniel A Weiskopf

Biographic Data

ID954477
NAMEDaniel A Weiskopf
GIVEN NAMESDaniel A
FAMILY NAMEWeiskopf
SIGNATUREWEISKOPF D A
AFFILIATIONSGeorgia State University
ORCID0000-0002-2788-2280
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS15
TOTAL CITATIONS103
WORKS AS AUTHOR15
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2004
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX6
  • Trading Evidence

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2025

    Scientific fields frequently need to exchange data to advance their own inquiries. Data unification is the process of stabilizing these forms of interfield data exchange. I present an account of the epistemic structure of data unification, drawing on case studies from model-based cognitive neuroscience (MBCN). MBCN is distinctive because it shows that modeling practices play an essential role in mediating these data exchanges. Models often serve …

  • Computation as the boundary of the cognitive

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Mind & Language•2024

    Khalidi identifies cognition with Marrian computation. He further argues that Marrian levels of inquiry should be interpreted ontologically as corresponding to distinct semi‐closed causal domains. But this counterintuitively places the causal domain of representations outside of cognition proper. A closer look at Khalidi's account of concepts shows that these allegedly separate Marrian domains are more tightly integrated than he allows. Theories …

  • The Predictive Turn in Neuroscience

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2022

    Neuroscientists have in recent years turned to building models that aim to generate predictions rather than explanations. This “predictive turn” has swept across domains including law, marketing, and neuropsychiatry. Yet the norms of prediction remain undertheorized relative to those of explanation. I examine two styles of predictive modeling and show how they exemplify the normative dynamics at work in prediction. I propose an account of how pre…

  • Representing and coordinating ethnobiological knowledge

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020•Cited by: 6•References: 29

  • Ethnoontology

    Open Access•David Ludwig, Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2019•Cited by: 13•References: 56

    This article outlines a program of ethnoontology that brings together empirical research in the ethnosciences with ontological debates in philosophy. First, we survey empirical evidence from heterogeneous cultural contexts and disciplines. Second, we propose a model of cross-cultural relations between ontologies beyond a simple divide between universalist and relativist models. Third, we argue for an integrative model of ontology building that sy…

  • Integrative Modeling and the Role of Neural Constraints

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2016•Cited by: 6•References: 21

    Neuroscience constrains psychology, but stating these constraints with precision is not simple. Here I consider whether mechanistic analysis provides a useful way to integrate models of cognitive and neural structure. Recent evidence suggests that cognitive systems map onto overlapping, distributed networks of brain regions. These highly entangled networks often depart from stereotypical mechanistic behaviors. While this casts doubt on the prospe…

  • An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf, Daniel Weiskopf et al.•BOOK•Introduction to the Philosophy of…•2015

    Psychology aims to give us a scientific account of how the mind works. But what does it mean to have a science of the mental, and what sort of picture of the mind emerges from our best psychological theories? This book addresses these philosophical puzzles in a way that is accessible to readers with little or no background in psychology or neuroscience. Using clear and detailed case studies and drawing on up-to-date empirical research, it examine…

  • Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 33•References: 40

  • The Functional Unity of Special Science Kinds

    Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2011•Cited by: 12•References: 39

    The view that special science properties are multiply realizable has been attacked in recent years by Shapiro, Bechtel and Mundale, Polger, and others. Focusing on psychological and neuroscientific properties, I argue that these attacks are unsuccessful. By drawing on interspecies physiological comparisons I show that diverse physical mechanisms can converge on common functional properties at multiple levels. This is illustrated with examples fro…

  • Understanding is not simulating

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

  • Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010•Cited by: 7•References: 24

  • The plurality of concepts

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2009•Cited by: 20•References: 67

  • Atomism, Pluralism, and Conceptual Content

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Conceptual atomists argue that most of our concepts are primitive. I take up three arguments that have been thought to support atomism and show that they are inconclusive. The evidence that allegedly backs atomism is equally compatible with a localist position on which concepts are structured representations with complex semantic content. I lay out such a localist position and argue that the appropriate position for a non‐atomist to adopt is a pl…

  • Compound Nominals, Context, and Compositionality

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2007•Cited by: 3•References: 24

  • The Place of Time in Cognition

    Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2004•Cited by: 1•References: 14

    Dynamical systems theorists (dynamicists) allege that symbolic models of cognition are essentially incomplete because they fail to capture the temporal properties of mental processing. I present two possible interpretations of the dynamicists' argument from time and show that neither one is successful. The disagreement between dynamicists and symbolic theorists rests not on temporal considerations per se, but on differences over the multiple real…

  • Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 33•References: 40

  • The plurality of concepts

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2009•Cited by: 20•References: 67

  • Ethnoontology

    Open Access•David Ludwig, Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2019•Cited by: 13•References: 56

    This article outlines a program of ethnoontology that brings together empirical research in the ethnosciences with ontological debates in philosophy. First, we survey empirical evidence from heterogeneous cultural contexts and disciplines. Second, we propose a model of cross-cultural relations between ontologies beyond a simple divide between universalist and relativist models. Third, we argue for an integrative model of ontology building that sy…

  • The Functional Unity of Special Science Kinds

    Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2011•Cited by: 12•References: 39

    The view that special science properties are multiply realizable has been attacked in recent years by Shapiro, Bechtel and Mundale, Polger, and others. Focusing on psychological and neuroscientific properties, I argue that these attacks are unsuccessful. By drawing on interspecies physiological comparisons I show that diverse physical mechanisms can converge on common functional properties at multiple levels. This is illustrated with examples fro…

  • Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010•Cited by: 7•References: 24

  • Representing and coordinating ethnobiological knowledge

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020•Cited by: 6•References: 29

  • Integrative Modeling and the Role of Neural Constraints

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2016•Cited by: 6•References: 21

    Neuroscience constrains psychology, but stating these constraints with precision is not simple. Here I consider whether mechanistic analysis provides a useful way to integrate models of cognitive and neural structure. Recent evidence suggests that cognitive systems map onto overlapping, distributed networks of brain regions. These highly entangled networks often depart from stereotypical mechanistic behaviors. While this casts doubt on the prospe…

  • Compound Nominals, Context, and Compositionality

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2007•Cited by: 3•References: 24

  • Atomism, Pluralism, and Conceptual Content

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Conceptual atomists argue that most of our concepts are primitive. I take up three arguments that have been thought to support atomism and show that they are inconclusive. The evidence that allegedly backs atomism is equally compatible with a localist position on which concepts are structured representations with complex semantic content. I lay out such a localist position and argue that the appropriate position for a non‐atomist to adopt is a pl…

  • The Place of Time in Cognition

    Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2004•Cited by: 1•References: 14

    Dynamical systems theorists (dynamicists) allege that symbolic models of cognition are essentially incomplete because they fail to capture the temporal properties of mental processing. I present two possible interpretations of the dynamicists' argument from time and show that neither one is successful. The disagreement between dynamicists and symbolic theorists rests not on temporal considerations per se, but on differences over the multiple real…

  • The Place of Time in Cognition

    Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2004•Cited by: 1•References: 14

    Dynamical systems theorists (dynamicists) allege that symbolic models of cognition are essentially incomplete because they fail to capture the temporal properties of mental processing. I present two possible interpretations of the dynamicists' argument from time and show that neither one is successful. The disagreement between dynamicists and symbolic theorists rests not on temporal considerations per se, but on differences over the multiple real…

  • Compound Nominals, Context, and Compositionality

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2007•Cited by: 3•References: 24

  • The plurality of concepts

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2009•Cited by: 20•References: 67

  • Atomism, Pluralism, and Conceptual Content

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Conceptual atomists argue that most of our concepts are primitive. I take up three arguments that have been thought to support atomism and show that they are inconclusive. The evidence that allegedly backs atomism is equally compatible with a localist position on which concepts are structured representations with complex semantic content. I lay out such a localist position and argue that the appropriate position for a non‐atomist to adopt is a pl…

  • Understanding is not simulating

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

  • Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010•Cited by: 7•References: 24

  • Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 33•References: 40

  • The Functional Unity of Special Science Kinds

    Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2011•Cited by: 12•References: 39

    The view that special science properties are multiply realizable has been attacked in recent years by Shapiro, Bechtel and Mundale, Polger, and others. Focusing on psychological and neuroscientific properties, I argue that these attacks are unsuccessful. By drawing on interspecies physiological comparisons I show that diverse physical mechanisms can converge on common functional properties at multiple levels. This is illustrated with examples fro…

  • An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf, Daniel Weiskopf et al.•BOOK•Introduction to the Philosophy of…•2015

    Psychology aims to give us a scientific account of how the mind works. But what does it mean to have a science of the mental, and what sort of picture of the mind emerges from our best psychological theories? This book addresses these philosophical puzzles in a way that is accessible to readers with little or no background in psychology or neuroscience. Using clear and detailed case studies and drawing on up-to-date empirical research, it examine…

  • Integrative Modeling and the Role of Neural Constraints

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2016•Cited by: 6•References: 21

    Neuroscience constrains psychology, but stating these constraints with precision is not simple. Here I consider whether mechanistic analysis provides a useful way to integrate models of cognitive and neural structure. Recent evidence suggests that cognitive systems map onto overlapping, distributed networks of brain regions. These highly entangled networks often depart from stereotypical mechanistic behaviors. While this casts doubt on the prospe…

  • Ethnoontology

    Open Access•David Ludwig, Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2019•Cited by: 13•References: 56

    This article outlines a program of ethnoontology that brings together empirical research in the ethnosciences with ontological debates in philosophy. First, we survey empirical evidence from heterogeneous cultural contexts and disciplines. Second, we propose a model of cross-cultural relations between ontologies beyond a simple divide between universalist and relativist models. Third, we argue for an integrative model of ontology building that sy…

  • Representing and coordinating ethnobiological knowledge

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020•Cited by: 6•References: 29

  • The Predictive Turn in Neuroscience

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2022

    Neuroscientists have in recent years turned to building models that aim to generate predictions rather than explanations. This “predictive turn” has swept across domains including law, marketing, and neuropsychiatry. Yet the norms of prediction remain undertheorized relative to those of explanation. I examine two styles of predictive modeling and show how they exemplify the normative dynamics at work in prediction. I propose an account of how pre…

  • Computation as the boundary of the cognitive

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Mind & Language•2024

    Khalidi identifies cognition with Marrian computation. He further argues that Marrian levels of inquiry should be interpreted ontologically as corresponding to distinct semi‐closed causal domains. But this counterintuitively places the causal domain of representations outside of cognition proper. A closer look at Khalidi's account of concepts shows that these allegedly separate Marrian domains are more tightly integrated than he allows. Theories …

  • Trading Evidence

    Open Access•Daniel A Weiskopf•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2025

    Scientific fields frequently need to exchange data to advance their own inquiries. Data unification is the process of stabilizing these forms of interfield data exchange. I present an account of the epistemic structure of data unification, drawing on case studies from model-based cognitive neuroscience (MBCN). MBCN is distinctive because it shows that modeling practices play an essential role in mediating these data exchanges. Models often serve …

Epistemology (14 works) · Philosophy (14 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Psychology (9 works) · Cognition (8 works) · Cognitive psychology (8 works) · Cognitive science (8 works) · Action Observation and Synchronization (5 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (5 works) · Sociology (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae