Thinking Deeply, Thinking Emotionally
How High School Students Make Sense of Evidence
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11071191 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rebecca Jacobsen (0000-0002-6637-617X, Michigan State University, autor correspondente), Anne‐lise Halvorsen (0000-0001-5427-6254, Michigan State University), Anne-Lise Halvorsen (Michigan State University), Amanda Frasier (0000-0001-5870-1799, Michigan State University), Amanda Slaten Frasier (Michigan State University), Adam Schmitt (Michigan State University), Adam J Schmitt (Michigan State University), Margaret Smith Crocco (Michigan State University), Margaret Crocco (Michigan State University), Avner Segall (Michigan State University) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 232-276 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Theory & Research in Social Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0093-3104 • E-ISSN: 2163-1654 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00933104.2018.1425170 |
| OpenAlex | W2792218524 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 65 |
This mixed-methods study analyzed adolescents’ evaluation of the trustworthiness of different kinds of evidence and their reasons for why they trusted (or did not trust) them. Specifically, we analyzed adolescents’ rankings of seven kinds of evidence in the abstract and in the context of a settled historical event (school desegregation) and whether differences existed between their rankings. We explored the reasons adolescents provided for trusting or not trusting sources and whether differences existed between these reasons in the abstract and in context. We also explored whether rankings differed across sociocultural identities. We found that, on average, adolescents’ rankings, as well as their reasoning, differed when the evidence was presented in the abstract versus in the context of school desegregation. We also found that emotion and personal relationship with the topic are compelling factors in determining students’ trust in sources—a finding that has previously been overlooked in the scholarship. This study provides implications for K–12 social studies education, teacher education, and civic identity and citizenship studies
Citizenship · Context (archaeology · Desegregation · Developmental psychology · Identity (music · Political science · Scholarship · Sociocultural evolution · Sociology · Trustworthiness · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Psychology · Social Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Pushing back
Psychosocial processes and human desire
Historical thinking online
Promoting students’ critical evaluation of popular scientific articles
Revealing complexities when adult readers engage in the credibility evaluation of social media posts
Examining the role of student teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT and resilience to digital distractions on their evaluation of online information
Developing mutually respectful research-practice partnerships while engaging young citizens
Navigating identity as a controversial issue
My thinking has changed but beliefs have not
Students evaluating the trustworthiness of historical sources and internet sources
Truth or beauty? Social studies teachers’ beliefs about the instructional purposes of data visualizations
Conversation is everything”
Deliberation can wait
Social studies education research for sustainable democratic societies
Exploring the emotional dynamics of a political discussion
Arts integrated historical empathy
Authority and Carnival
Controversy in the Classroom
Teenage Citizens
Next Generation Science Standards
“It Wasn't a Good Part of History”
Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry
Framing for scientific argumentation
Teaching and learning science as argument
“If I look at the mass I will never act”
Disciplinary Literacy in History
The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition
Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials
Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education
Making sense of argumentation and explanation
Confirmation Bias
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving
Talking Together
Handbook of Qualitative Research
A New Engagement
Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents
Identity Development-in-Context
Civic Competence in Urban Youth
Teaching with and for discussion
Deconstructing Differences in African-American and European-American Adolescents’ Perspectives on U.S. History
Evidence Use and the Common Core State Standards Movement
Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process
Can Studying Adolescents’ Thinking Amplify High-Leverage Social Studies Teaching Practice? Challenges of Synthesizing Pedagogies of Investigation and Enactment in School–Institutional Contexts
Predicting Students' Use of Evidence
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
Discussing Controversial Public Issues in Secondary Social Studies Classrooms
Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age
What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy
On the Reading of Historical Texts
Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education
Voice in the Classroom
Sticking Together
Controversies about Controversial Issues in Democratic Education
Mixed Methods Research
What We Know About Engendering Civic Identity
Therapeutic Songwriting in Music Therapy
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 17 |