Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition

Limited over-explicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11655640
AutoresAnne Therese Frederiksen (0000-0003-0387-3774, University of California San Diego, CA, USA, autor correspondente), Rachel I Mayberry (0000-0002-0819-4140, University of California San Diego, CA, USA)
Ano2018
Volume35
Fascículo2
Páginas253-283
Data de publicação2018-01-29
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSecond language Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0267-6583 • E-ISSN: 1477-0326
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0267658317750220
PMID31656363
OpenAlexW2787195323
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas9
Referências citadas79

Previous research on reference tracking has revealed a tendency towards over-explicitness in second language (L2) learners. Only limited evidence exists that this trend extends to situations where the learner's first and second languages do not share a sensory-motor modality. Using a story-telling paradigm, this study examined how hearing novice L2 learners accomplish reference tracking in American Sign Language (ASL), and whether they transfer strategies from gesture. Our results revealed limited evidence of over-explicitness. Instead there was an overall similarity in the L2 learners' reference tracking to that of a native signer control group, even in the use of lexical nominals, pronouns and zero anaphora - areas where research on spoken L2 reference tracking predicts differences. Our data also revealed, however, that L2 learners have problems with the referential value of ASL classifiers, and with target-like use of zero anaphora from different verb types, as well as spatial modification. This suggests that over-explicitness occurs in the early stages of different modality L2 acquisition to a limited extent. We found no evidence of gestural transfer. Finally, we found that L2 learners reintroduce more than native signers, which could indicate that they, unlike native signers are not yet capable of utilizing the affordances of the visual modality to reference multiple entities simultaneously

Affordance · American Sign Language · Cognitive psychology · Contrast (vision · Gesture · Linguistics · Modality (human–computer interaction · Referent · Second-language acquisition · Sign language · Verb · Computer Science · Hand Gesture Recognition Systems · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Limits to resilience

    Anne Therese Frederiksen, Rachel I Mayberry•Language Learning and Development•2025

  • Exploring positional and dimensional aspects of topographic space for advanced-level British Sign Language learners

    Open Access•Nicola Nunn•Sign Language & Linguistics•2024

  • Adjective position and referential efficiency in American Sign Language

    Open Access•Paula Rubio-Fernández, Anne Wienholz et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2022

  • A longitudinal study of topic continuity in Chinese EFL learners’ written narratives

    Yan Liu, Jinting Cai•IRAL - International Review of…•2023

  • How are signed languages learned as second languages

    Open Access•Cynthia Marshall, Chloë Marshall et al.•Language and Linguistics Compass•2021

  • Turkish-Dutch bilinguals maintain language-specific reference tracking strategies in elicited narratives

    Open Access•Zeynep Azar, Aslı Özyürek et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Reference tracking strategies of deaf adult signers in Turkish Sign Language

    Open Access•Onur Keleş, Furkan Atmaca et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2023

  • The challenges of viewpoint-taking when learning a sign language

    Open Access•Sannah Gulamani, Cynthia Marshall et al.•Second language Research•2020

  • Iconicity and Gesture Jointly Facilitate Learning of Second Language Signs at First Exposure in Hearing Nonsigners

    Open Access•Dilay Z Karadöller, David Peeters et al.•Language Learning•2024

  • Topic continuity in spoken English

    T Givón•Typological Studies in Language•1983

  • Sign Language and Linguistic Universals

    Open Access•Wendy Sandler, Diane Lillo-Martin•Sign Language and Linguistic…•2006

  • Selective optionality in language development

    Antonella Sorace•Syntax and Variation•2005

  • Bimodal bilingualism

    Open Access•Karen Emmorey, HELSA B BORINSTEIN et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2008

  • Rethinking constructed action

    Kearsy Cormier, Sandra Smith et al.•Sign Language & Linguistics•2015

  • Syntactic Acquisition in Bilingual Children

    Open Access•Jim Paradis, Johanne Paradis et al.•Studies in Second Language…•1996

  • Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents (RLE Linguistics B

    Mira Ariel•Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents…•2014

  • Sign Language

    Richard Pfau, Marilyn Steinbach et al.•Sign Language•2012

  • Language interaction effects in bimodal bilingualism

    Elena Koulidobrova, Elena V Koulidobrova•Linguistic Approaches to…•2017

  • Preferred Argument in Second Language Discourse

    Lorraine E Kumpf•Studies in Language•1992

  • Reference control in the narratives of adult sign language learners

    Open Access•Aurora Bel, Marta Ortells et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives

    Open Access•Maya Hickmann, Henriëtte Hendriks•Journal of Child Language•1999

  • When agreeing to disagree is not enough

    Josep Quer•Theoretical Linguistics•2011

  • Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL

    Open Access•Terry Janzen•Cognitive Linguistics•2004

  • Body partitioning and real-space blends

    Open Access•Paul G Dudis•Cognitive Linguistics•2004

  • Sign Language and the Foundations of Anaphora

    Philippe Schlenker•Annual Review of Linguistics•2017

  • Gesture and information structure in first and second language

    Keiko Yoshioka•Gesture•2008

  • Variable “subject” presence in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language

    Open Access•Rachel Mckee, Adam Schembri et al.•Language Variation and Change•2011

  • Elaborating Who's What

    Laurent Ferrara, Lindsay Ferrara et al.•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2014

  • Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian

    Open Access•Antonella Sorace, Francesca Filiaci•Second language Research•2006

  • Elide me bare

    Open Access•Elena Koulidobrova•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2017

  • Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language

    Open Access•Diane Lillo-Martin•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1986

  • Gestural Viewpoint Signals Referent Accessibility

    Sandra Debreslioska, Asli Özyürek et al.•Discourse Processes•2013

  • The Pear Stories

    Deborah Schiffrin, Wallace L Chafe•Language•1981

  • A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English

    Timothy C Frazer, Thom Huebner•Language•1984

  • Relating Events in Narrative

    Richard J Gerrig, Ruth A Berman et al.•Language•1995

  • On the Other Hand

    Marina L McIntire, Phillip A Jones et al.•Language•1979

  • Pinning down the concept of "interface" in bilingualism

    Antonella Sorace•Linguistic Approaches to…•2011

  • Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development

    Open Access•Antonella Sorace, Ludovica Serratrice•International Journal of…•2009

  • Referring and accessibility

    Open Access•Mira Ariel•Journal of Linguistics•1988

  • Topic and Subject Prominence in Interlanguage Development

    Open Access•Euen Hyuk Jung, Euen Hyuk Sarah Jung•Language Learning•2004

  • Topic-Prominence in Interlanguage

    Open Access•Judith W Fuller, Jeanette K Gundel et al.•Language Learning•1987

  • Handling Discourse

    Open Access•Marianne Gullberg•Language Learning•2006

  • Overexplicit Referent Tracking in L2 English

    Open Access•Jonathon Ryan•Language Learning•2015

  • Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages

    Open Access•Kearsy Cormier, David Quinto‐pozo et al.•Language & Communication•2012

  • The Licensing of Null Arguments in American Sign Language

    Benjamin Bahan, Judy Kegl et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2000

  • Who's on First? Investigating the referential hierarchy in simple native ASL narratives

    Open Access•Anne Therese Frederiksen, Rachel I Mayberry•Lingua•2016

  • Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization

    Open Access•Antonella Sorace, Ludovica Serratrice et al.•Lingua•2009

  • Can constructed action be considered obligatory

    Open Access•David Quinto‐pozo, David Quinto-Pozos•Lingua•2007

  • Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives

    Open Access•Kearsy Cormier, Sandra Smith et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Coordinate Structures and Language Universals in Interlanguage 1

    Open Access•Maxine Schmidt•Language Learning•1980

  • Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language

    Open Access•Jordan Fenlon, Adam Schembri et al.•Language•2018

  • Space, Time, and Person Reference in American Sign Language

    Lynn A Friedman•Language•1975

  • Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse

    Jeanette K Gundel, Jeanette Κ Gundel et al.•Language•1993

  • Arbitrariness and Iconicity

    Nancy Frishberg•Language•1975

Obras citantes distintas9
Citações por ano1,5
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2025 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 9
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae