Group position as a function of member attitudes
Choice shift effects from the perspective of social decision scheme theory
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6205060 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Norbert L Kerr (0000-0003-0115-0767, autor correspondente), Janet Haggerty Davis (0000-0001-9573-3597), James H Davis (0000-0002-3522-0498), David Meek (0000-0001-8030-2292), A Kent Rissman |
| Ano | 1975 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 574-593 |
| Data de publicação | 1975-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/h0076483 |
| OpenAlex | W2067728093 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 20 |
| Referências citadas | 18 |
500 undergraduates made decisions as individuals or 4-person groups about several attitude objects along a 7-point semantic differential scale and about several social issues along a percentage scale. Individual-group mean differences (both within and between Ss) suggested that choice shift effects observed in other studies also characterized these data, but inspection of entire distributions suggested that conclusions based on means alone (or other single statistics) may be incomplete. The nature of individual-group distributional differences aided the interpretation of choice shift effects. Predictions from several common social decision scheme models were compared with the group attitudinal decision distributions to ascertain the general kind of social process theory that might be required. A majority-averaging decision scheme best predicted the semantic differential items but not percentage items. A model incorporating Ss' perceptions of the population preferences also gave a generally accurate account of group attitudes for the semantic differential items
Economics · Function (biology · Group (periodic table · Group Decision Making · Perspective (graphical · Position (finance · Artificial Intelligence · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Bias in judgment
Social transition schemes
Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift
Effects of group size and procedural influence on consensual judgments of quantity
Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
The group polarization phenomenon
Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology
Effect of Group Means on the Probability of Consensus
On the Virtues of Assuming Minimal Differences in Information Processing in Individuals and Groups
The Plaintiff Bias in Mock Civil Jury Decision Making
Scientific inquiry on how groups decide
Democracy and scientific expertise
Another Look at the Conformity Explanation of Group-Induced Shifts in Choice
Moral Reasoning in Groups
The Social Influence of Confidence in Group Decision Making
Social decision schemes and choice shift
Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks
Social combination processes and individual learning for six-person cooperative groups on an intellective task
Centrality and Accuracy in Group Quantity Estimations
Social choice theory, social decision scheme theory, and group decision-making
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes
Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization
Social decision schemes under risk
Distribution of initial risk levels and group decisions involving risk
Group decision schemes and strategy preferences in a sequential response task
Individual and group risk-taking in a two-choice situation
Group discussion and prediscussion assessment of preferences in the risky shift
Determinants of scientific progress
Group decision and social interaction
Studies in group decision II
Enhancement of dominant attitudes in group discussion
Intergroup relations and polarization of individual and collective judgments
The group as a polarizer of attitudes
Risk taking by individuals and groups
A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957
Group influence on individual risk taking
| Obras citantes distintas | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1976 - 2013 (38) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 20 |