Fundamentals of critical argumentation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6522905 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Douglas N Walton, Douglas Walton |
| Ano | 2005 |
| Páginas | 343 |
| Data de publicação | 2005-01-01 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Periódico | Fundamentals of critical argumentation (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9780511807039 |
| ISBN | 9780521530200, 9780511807039 |
| Open Library | OL3391688M, OL34477014M |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 93 |
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation presents the basic tools for the identification, analysis, and evaluation of common arguments for beginners. The book teaches by using examples of arguments in dialogues, both in the text itself and in the exercises. Examples of controversial legal, political, and ethical arguments are analyzed. Illustrating the most common kinds of arguments, the book also explains how to evaluate each kind by critical questioning. Douglas Walton shows how arguments can be reasonable under the right dialogue conditions by using critical questions to evaluate them. The book teaches by example, both in the text itself and in exercises, but it is based on methods that have been developed through the author's thirty years of research in argumentation studies.
Reasoning · Argumentatie · Argumentation · Debates and debating · Kritisches Denken · Logic · Logik · Philosophy · Schlussfolgern
Exploring Generalizations
Du bien-fondé didactique d’une analyse textuelle critique des idéologies dans les discours de communication publique
La notion d’«argumentation» et ses définitions
Konstruksi argumentasi putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gunung Sitoli No. 07/Pid.B/2013/PN-GS
The Rhetorical Devices of the Keepers of State Secrets
Online visit opinions about attractions of the religious heritage
On the Pathology of the Enthymeme
Deleuze, Guattari and the use of web-based corpora for facilitating critical analysis of public sphere arguments
Developing indicators for sustainable urban regeneration in historic urban areas
Types of types of educational dialogue
Analysis of the relationships between students' argumentation and their views on nature of science
The Argument Web
Definition as an argumentative strategy in parliamentary discourse
Cooperative expressions of disagreement in Romanian culture
Construction of identity and the rhetoric of lying in Romanian political discourse
An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites
Constructing Academic Identity Through Critical Argumentation
Multimodal mechanisms of political discourse dynamics and the case of Germany’s nuclear energy phase-out
A Pragmatic Analysis of Fallacies in English Religious Argumentative Discourse
Rhetorical Contrast Between Turkey and the Ottoman Empire
Providing Argument Support for E-Participation
Encuentros cercanos con argumentos del “tercer tipo”
Irrelevance in Eu, United Kingdom and Serbian Parliamentary Discourse
Evaluating policy as argument
A argumentação não tem função
Changing Policy With Words
A cláusula geral do erro administrativo e o dever de precaução
Dialogue as a Journalistic Ideal
Considering risk assessment up close
Reframing judicial proof
What Quality Talk in a Reading Circle Does for Interthinking
Metáfora y terrorismo étnico
Representational transformations
A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations
Exploring normativity in disability studies
Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis)
Promoting students’ critical evaluation of popular scientific articles
Recalibrating the evolution versus creationism debate for student learning
A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation
Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentative Dialogues in Different Modelling Situations
Beyond the Passive Absorption of Information
Critically Reading Science-Related Texts Produced by ChatGPT
Making Argumentation-Based Learning and Teaching Happen
Info-arguments
Annotating Argument Schemes
Presuppositional Fallacies
Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements
Affecting Argumentative Action
When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate
The Recursive Argument Structure
Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation
Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions
Epidemiology of Fallacies
Examples
Metaphors and argumentation
Persuasive presuppositions
What we hide in words
Metaphors in the perspective of argumentation
Alienating evidence based medicine vs. innovative medical device marketing
Developing Argumentation Strategies in Electronic Dialogs
Calidad argumentativa y aspectos temporales del habla en adultos mayores chilenos
Da Polémica À (Im)polidez
Afinal, o que é um argumento
A normative framework for argument quality
Argumentum Ad Alia
Questions as Dialogue Games. The Pragmatic Dimensions of “Authentic” Questions
Finding the place of argumentation in science education
An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts
The Pandemic of Argumentation
Multi-discourse Modes in Student Writing
Critical thinking
Strengthening Critical Health Literacy for Health Information Appraisal
Assessment of Oral Skills in Adolescents
Dördüncü Ve Beşi̇nci̇ Sinif Öğrenci̇leri̇ni̇n Argüman Yapilari
Nouvelle rhétorique et formation du citoyen
Critical Thinking and Conspiracy Theories. Towards Rhetorical Virtues
Esprit critique et discours conspirationnistes
The relation between critical online reasoning skills of first-semester university students and their epistemological beliefs
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies
“Argument as War”
Are Insinuated Ad Hominem Arguments Rhetorically Effective? Yes, but Conditions Apply
Le raisonnement donné en partage
Deliberative Sincerity and the Opacity of the Self
Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
A dialectical approach to presupposition
Beyond the survey
Time, place and theme in heritage conservation
Models of Argumentation in Socio-Political Telegram Channels’ Texts
A systematic review of Terf behaviour online in relation to sociopsychological group dynamics
Enabling Large-Scale Deliberation Using Attention-Mediation Metrics
Reciprocal interactions between teachers’ instructional moves and students’ social reasoning during collaborative small group discussions
Enjeux argumentatifs de la définition
| Citações por ano | 4,89 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Altamente citado | Não |