Observational Learning in Pigeons
The effects of Model Proficiency on Observer Performance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10122236 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marina Vanayan (University of Toronto, corresponding author), Heather Robertson (University of Toronto), Heather A Robertson, G B Biederman (University of Toronto) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 112 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 349-357 |
| Publication date | 1985-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of General Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1309 • E-ISSN: 1940-0888 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00221309.1985.9711023 |
| OpenAlex | W1988416777 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
Observational learning of a successive visual discrimination problem by pigeons was studied using conspecifics as models performing at proficient or at nonproficient levels. During the observational period, observers were confined without response opportunity and were subsequently trained in the model's discriminative task. Significantly better performance in subsequent learning was found for observers of nonproficient models. In contrast, no significant differences in learning of the visual discrimination task were found between pigeons that observed proficient models and pigeons that had undergone only confinement in the observation apparatus or those trained without prior observation or confinement experience. The apparent paradox of less proficient models producing better learners may be related to the consequences of observing additional negative-stimulus responding per se or to observation of models' behavior changing from less proficient to more proficient with consequent improvement in reinforcement opportunity
Cognitive psychology · Contrast (vision · Discriminative model · Experiential learning · Mathematics education · Observational learning · Observational study · Observer (physics · Reinforcement · Statistics · Stimulus (psychology · Task (project management · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Animal Nutrition and Physiology · Artificial Intelligence · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|