Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of reinforcer probability on attending to element and compound sample stimuli

Bibliographic Data

ID10244429
AuthorsEric A Thrailkill (0000-0003-2725-5428, University of Vermont Burlington VT USA, corresponding author), Christopher A Podlesnik (0000-0002-8614-8158, University of Florida Gainesville FL USA), Stacey L Quick (Utah State University Logan UT USA), Timothy A Shahan (0000-0002-6338-8714, Utah State University Logan UT USA)
Year2025
Volume124
Issue1
Pagese70023-e70023
Publication date2025-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5002 • E-ISSN: 1938-3711
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jeab.70023
PMID40384168
OpenAlexW4410507155
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited42

Previous research has shown that divided‐attention performance is sensitive to variations in relative reinforcement in a manner consistent with the generalized matching law. Two experiments with pigeons were designed to better understand the effects of different reinforcement conditions on divided‐attention performance. Experiment 1 asked whether separate experience with different relative reinforcement probabilities for elements alone would produce changes in performance during nondifferentially reinforced divided‐attention trials with compound samples consisting of those elements. The results suggest that accuracy following compound sample trials varied as a function of relative reinforcement experienced in element trials in a manner consistent with the matching law. Experiment 2 used an adjusting‐sample‐duration procedure to maintain constant accuracy on element and divided‐attention trials and varied the probability of reinforcement across conditions. The sample durations that were required to maintain constant accuracy increased as reinforcement probability decreased even though that longer sample durations were required to maintain accuracy for compound‐sample trials than for element‐sample trials (the element‐superiority effect). Overall, the present results are consistent with the notion that increased attention is allocated to stimuli that are associated with more reinforcement

Matching (statistics) · Reinforcement · Sample (material) · Statistics · Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Chemistry · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Effects of reinforcer probability on attending to element and compound sample stimuli

    Open Access•Eric A Thrailkill, Christopher A Podlesnik et al.•Journal of the Experimental…•2025

  • Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics

    Harry Levitt•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1971

  • A theory of attention

    N J Mackintosh•Psychological Review•1975

  • Value-driven attentional capture

    Open Access•Brian A Anderson, Patryk A Laurent et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Attention to Action

    Open Access•Derek A Norman, Donald A Norman et al.•Consciousness and Self-Regulation•1986

  • Effects of reinforcer probability on attending to element and compound sample stimuli

    Open Access•Eric A Thrailkill, Christopher A Podlesnik et al.•Journal of the Experimental…•2025

  • Selective Attention in Animal Discrimination Learning

    Thomas R Zentall, Donald A Riley•The Journal of General Psychology•2000

  • Orienting of Attention

    Open Access•Michael I Posner•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1980

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae