Argument-Structure Constructions with Organization Names in the English Eurolect
The Case of [ORG + V + that + SC]
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10304174 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernando Sánchez Rodas (0000-0003-4244-1835, Universidad de Málaga, corresponding author), Gloria Corpas Pastor (0000-0001-6688-1531, Universidad de Málaga) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 12-30 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Names (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-7738 • E-ISSN: 1756-2279 |
| Publisher | University Library System, University of Pittsburgh (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5195/names.2023.2534 |
| OpenAlex | W4379928943 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 24 |
Construction Grammar (Hoffmann & Trousdale 2013) has received very little attention in onomastics, let alone corpus-based approaches, as corpora are just starting to be applied to the empirical study of names (Motschenbacher 2020). This study employs Named Entity Recognition plus verbal pattern extraction in an intermodal corpus (Bernardini 2016) of EU discourse, or Eurolect (Sandrelli 2018). The methodological aim is to mine English argument-structure constructions (Goldberg 1995) with subordinate clauses introduced by that and organization names in the subject slot ([ORG + V + that + SC]). First, the personification recognition method of Dorst, Mulder, and Steen (2011) is applied to quantitatively prove the strong relationship between the extracted argument-structure constructions and personification metaphors in EU discourse. Second, the constructions and their form-meaning pairings are described, both per subcorpus and globally. Results show that, at a macro- and meso-level of schematicity, the [ORG + V + that + SC] construction transversally symbolizes personification as an understanding scheme for institutional relations, constructing organization names with semantically human verbs of belief, speech, and thought. At a microscopic level, however, some constructions occur exclusively in one of the four subcorpora (non-translated, translated, non-interpreted, and interpreted English), meaning that they could be covering specific mediating functions through their name-verb slot choices
Argument (complex analysis · Construction Grammar · Epistemology · Grammar · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Subject (documents · Verb · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices
A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification
Constructions at Work
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar
Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies — Implications and Applications
Translation and interpreting of organisation names in the English and Spanish Eurolect
What Can Science, Religion, Politics, Culture and the Economy Do? A Corpus Study of Metonymical Conceptualization Combined with Personification
Recognition of personifications in fiction by non-expert readers
Socio-onomastics
Prototypicality Among Metaphors
Corpus Linguistic Onomastics
Constructional idioms of ‘insanity’ in English and Spanish
Metaphor
| Highly cited | No |
|---|