Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Predicting How Federal Managers Perceive Criteria Used for Their Promotion

Bibliographic Data

ID10401434
AuthorsJanice M Beyer, John M Stevens, John Stevens (0000-0002-9867-7209), Harrison M Trice
Year1980
Volume40
Issue1
Pages55-55
Publication date1980-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/976109
OpenAlexW2319299002
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited1

Administrative theory based on managerial experience and scholarly theories of motivation agree that rewarding workers for good performance encourages and usually produces better performance than failing to provide such rewards. Particular theories have been concerned to specify relevant rewards and the conditions under which rewards affect performance. In a relatively recent refinement to this general approach, expectancy theories of motivation suggest limiting conditions for the motivating effects of rewards.' According to expectancy theory, persons will be motivated to perform only those actions that they perceive to have some probability of leading to outcomes (rewards) which they desire. Furthermore, expectancy theory posits that motivation is the product of a multiplicative relationship between the expected probability of a given reward following a given behavior (or set of behaviors) and the value attached to that reward. Thus, even the most desired rewards will have little impact on behavior, according to expectancy theory, if workers perceive the probability of obtaining the reward for that behavior to be zero or close to zero. This research explores the expectations of managers working for U.S. government agencies regarding which factors are likely to lead to their promotion. Since monetary rewards are largely tied to advancement through grades in the civil service, promotions constitute the major extrinsic reward available to motivate these managers. Their perceptions of the promotional criteria used within their organizations, and the identification of factors predicting those perceptions thus have important implications for managerial performance in the federal government. Although the federal civil service is ostensibly a merit system, the criteria used to determine civil service grades include factors other than past performance. Qualifications, in terms of education or expertise, are also

Business · Political science · Politics · Process management · Promotion (chess · Public relations · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • R&D professionals' views of criteria for intrafirm job mobility

    Open Access•Torsten J Gerpott, Michel E Domsch et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1986

  • Intraorganizational mobility and work related attitudes

    Open Access•James C Mcelroy, Paula C Morrow et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1996

  • The Perceived Fairness of Managerial Promotion Practices

    Open Access•Mary Pat McEnrue•Human Relations•1989

  • Perceptions of Discrimination

    Open Access•Katherine C Naff•Policy Studies Journal•1995

  • An Empirical Study of Howard Becker's Side-Bet Theory

    George Ritzer, Harrison M Trice•Social Forces•1969

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,1
Citation span1986 - 1996 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae