Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

New Models of Religious Understanding

Bibliographic Data

ID10691566
AuthorsGuy Bennett‐hunter (University of Edinburgh, corresponding author), Guy Bennett-Hunter (University of Edinburgh)
Year2019
Volume69
Issue275
Pages429-432
Publication date2019-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pq/pqy040
OpenAlexW2890365020
LanguageEN
Citations received11

In his 1966 Principles of Christian Theology, John Macquarrie described the contemporary state of philosophy of religion as ‘ruinous’. He was dissatisfied by the inability of the traditional rational arguments in favour of religious beliefs to establish their own conclusions convincingly—let alone engage productively with the foundational concepts underwriting the actual practice of the world's religions. Yet, with Freud, Macquarrie also saw that ‘natural’ theology could never be replaced by its ‘revealed’ counterpart; rational supports will be necessary if religion and theology are to be protected, and indeed distinguished, from illusion and superstition. Macquarrie therefore called for a new style of philosophy of religion to take over the basic functions of old-style philosophy of religion without the attendant weaknesses. As Macquarrie envisaged it, philosophy of religion ‘in the new style’ would owe to the phenomenological method, being descriptive rather than purely deductive, and would attend not only to the rational arguments that are provided in religion's defence but also to the conviction that underlies and motivates them. It would take seriously the measure of participation involved in religious faith, which might enable it to be a far more effective apologetic tool than rational argument alone. And it would be existential rather than purely rational, taking the concrete, lived condition of human existence (which is not exhausted by its rational dimension) as its point of departure.

Argument (complex analysis) · Contemplation · Conviction · Epistemology · Existentialism · Faith · Philosophy of religion · Political science · Rationality · Sociology · Style (visual arts) · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious Education and Schools

  • Fostering fraternity in humanity

    Open Access•Dorlan Naibaho, Sandy Ariawan et al.•Kurios•2022

  • Don Cupitt and the Realism/Non-Realism Debate

    Jessica Eastwood•Modern Believing•2024

  • Who's afraid of epigenetics? Habits, instincts, and Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory

    Open Access•Mariagrazia Portera, Mauro Mandrioli•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2021

  • Theistic expansive naturalism

    Open Access•Jessica Eastwood•Religious Studies•2024

  • Embodied world construction

    Open Access•Jack Williams•Religious Studies•2024

  • Spiritual desire and religious practice

    Open Access•Clare Carlisle•Religious Studies•2019

  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty and the philosophy of religion

    Open Access•Jack Williams•Religious Studies•2021

  • On the goods of the religious life

    Open Access•MARK WYNN•Religious Studies•2017

  • The Danish-Halle Mission from the Perspective of Embodiment

    Erki Lind•Numen•2025

  • My Song is Love Unknown

    Open Access•Gregory R P Stacey•New Blackfriars•2022

  • Contemporary Naturalism, God, and the Methodological Relevance of Thomas Aquinas

    Open Access•Edward DeLaquil•New Blackfriars•2021

Citations per year1.22
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae