Farmers and the Origin of the Welfare State
Evidence from 308 Roll Call Votes between 1882 and 1940 ☆
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11005993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Magnus Bergli Rasmussen (0000-0003-3664-0555, Institutt for Statsvitenskap University of Oslo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 202-226 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scandinavian Political Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0080-6757 • E-ISSN: 1467-9477 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9477.12222 |
| OpenAlex | W4200168633 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 21 |
Studies of early social policy development highlight the progressive role of farmers, especially in Scandinavian countries. I argue that this notion does not match with the role played by farmer's representatives or the party in parliament. Being ideologically committed to more market‐oriented solutions, less exposed to labour market risks and fearing for their labour supply, Farmers as a social group and party, I argue, had strong incentives to resist welfare state expansion. This study moves beyond single events or a small selection of reforms used in previous studies, to ascertain preferences of farmers over all welfare reforms undertaken up to 1940. Using newly collected data on roll calls for 308 failed and successful legislative proposals in Norway between 1882 and 1940, totalling 24,791 votes this approach allows for greater precision in measuring the preferences of classes and parties on welfare policy. I find that farmer MPs as a class and later as a party consistently downvote generous welfare compared to the worker parties. Conservatives and Farmers turn out to be equally antagonistic to welfare proposals compared to Labour. This pattern is not substantially transformed during the period of Worker–Farmer coalitions of the 1930s. Further, considering the backgrounds of Members of Parliament (MP), farmers' representatives systematically vote against generous welfare proposals, even voting and vocally protesting coverage extensions to the rural sector. It is therefore doubtful whether the origins of Scandinavian universalism prior to 1940 can be found in the role played by farmers
Economics · Ideology · Incentive · Labour economics · Legislature · Market economy · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Voting · Welfare · Welfare state · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Development and Crisis of the Welfare State
The Politics of Social Solidarity
Social Capitalism
Inequality and Democratization
Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour
Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy
World war and welfare legislation in western countries
A historiographical survey of Det store hamskiftet in Norwegian agriculture
How Socialist is Solidaristic Social Policy? Swedish Postwar Reform as a Case in Point
The Scandinavian Route
Social Foundations of Political Order in Interwar Europe
Comparative Welfare State Politics
Distribution and Redistribution
Party Politics and the Organization of the Danish Welfare State, 1890–1920
The Politics of Social Risk
Adaptation of Agrarian Parties in Norway and Sweden
The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting
Revolution, Elite Fear, and Electoral Institutions
Labor Shortages, Rural Inequality, and Democratization
Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan
The Swedish Sonderweg in Question
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |