Does having a similar disability matter for match outcomes
A randomized study of matching mentors and mentees by visual impairment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11045271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eline C M Heppe (0000-0001-8920-2431, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, corresponding author), Janis B Kupersmidt (0000-0002-0559-2610, Innovation Research and Training), Sabina Kef (0000-0002-0820-1339, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Carlo Schuengel (0000-0001-5501-3341, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 210-226 |
| Publication date | 2019-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Community Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-4392 • E-ISSN: 1520-6629 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/jcop.22116 |
| PMID | 30706519 |
| OpenAlex | W2884071725 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 41 |
Mentoring is modestly effective for youth with a chronic illness or physical disability; however, program effectiveness may be enhanced when mentors and mentees are matched on shared interests and experiences. To test this hypothesis, mentees were randomly assigned to having a mentor with or without visual impairment (VI). Results showed that mentors without VI were younger and more likely to work or be educated in a helping profession and less likely to have a fixed mindset and extremely high positive expectations than mentors with VI. The main analyses on match outcomes showed that mentors with VI had significantly fewer and shorter match meetings, had a weaker relationship with their mentees, and were more likely to end their match prematurely. Mentor age, helping profession background, and fixed mindset were confounds in several analyses and reduced the significance of the relationship between VI group and match meeting quantity. The only relationship that remained significant controlling for covariates showed that matches including a mentor with VI were significantly more likely to end in premature closure than matches including a mentor without VI. Implications of the findings for future research and program practices related to matching were discussed
Closure (psychology) · Developmental psychology · Matching (statistics) · Mindset · Psychiatry · Randomized controlled trial · Test (biology) · Visual impairment · Clinical Psychology · Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion · Disability Education and Employment · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Mentoring and Academic Development · Psychology
Consort 2010 Statement
How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence
The effects of developmental mentoring and high school mentors' attendance on their younger mentees' self-esteem, social skills, and connectedness
Social networks of visually impaired and blind adolescents. Structure and effect on well-being
Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth
Developmental Mentoring Match Characteristics
The Give and Take of Volunteering
It's Not What I Expected”
The Test of Time
Predictors of Premature Match Closure in Youth Mentoring Relationships
Youth Initiated Mentoring
Mentoring Relationship Closures in Big Brothers Big Sisters Community Mentoring Programs
The Test of Time in School‐Based Mentoring
Introduction to the special issue
Mentoring special youth populations
Mentoring Relationships, Positive Development, Youth Emotional and Behavioral Problems
Stereotype formation and endorsement
It's ok — Not everyone can be good at math”
The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits
Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers
Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions
Breaking Up Is Hard to Do
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2023 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |