Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing the Writing Process

Do Writing-Intensive First-Year Seminars Change How Students Write

Bibliographic Data

ID11063186
AuthorsKenneth H Kolb (0000-0003-2310-0832, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA, corresponding author), K C Longest (0000-0002-4525-3373, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA), Mollie J Jensen (Nashville Public Schools, Nashville, TN, USA)
Year2013
Volume41
Issue1
Pages20-31
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTeaching Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-055X • E-ISSN: 1939-862X
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0092055x12448777
OpenAlexW2081407323
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited36

Sociologists and scholars of composition have long argued that in order to get students to improve the quality of what they write, they need to change how they write. Here, the authors assess whether students’ participation in writing-intensive first-year seminars leads to changes in their writing process. Data collected via pretest and posttest interviews of 34 students show that writing-intensive seminars help first-year students become better planners and revisers yet have little effect on the ways that they prewrite and draft. Additionally, students in their first semester of college demonstrate higher order writing processes at the beginning of their seminar than their second-semester counterparts and show more improvement over the course of the semester as well. We analyze the conditions that foster these patterns and suggest that increasing quantitative course requirements (i.e., page counts) may hamper students’ ability to adopt qualitatively better writing strategies

Academic writing · Composition (language · Higher education · Mathematics education · Order (exchange · Pedagogy · Political science · Process (computing · Quality (philosophy · Writing process · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • Implementing an institution-wide pedagogical change in an Israeli college

    Open Access•Dorit Barchana‐Lorand, Yehudith Weinberger•Policy Futures in Education•2024

  • Static vs. dynamic assessment of students’ writing exams

    Sahbi Hidri•International Multilingual…•2019

  • Rising to the Challenge

    Open Access•Xiaoping Li, LI Xiao-ping et al.•SAGE Open•2015

  • Modifying an Introduction to Criminal Justice Course to Be Writing-Intensive

    Natalie Goulette, Andrew Denney et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice…•2021

  • Producing Better Writers in Sociology

    Open Access•Todd Migliaccio, Jacqueline Carrigan•Teaching Sociology•2017

  • Bringing Deep Reading Back in

    Open Access•Yen-Ting Hsu, Ana López Ricoy•Teaching Sociology•2025

  • A critical reflection on the use of an embedded academic literacy program for teaching sociology

    Open Access•Merle Black, Michelle Black et al.•Journal of Sociology•2013

  • A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing

    Linda Flower, John R Hayes•College Composition and…•1981

  • Symbolic Interactionism

    Herbert Blumer•Symbolic Interactionism•1986

  • The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers

    Sondra Perl•Research in the Teaching of English•1979

  • An Analysis of the Writing Behavior of Good Student Writers

    Charles K Stallard•Research in the Teaching of English•1974

  • An Examination of the Writing Processes of Seven Year Old Children

    Donald H Graves•Research in the Teaching of English•1975

  • Enhancing Critical Reading and Writing through Peer Reviews

    Robert P Althauser, Robert Althauser et al.•Teaching Sociology•2001

  • My Understanding Has Grown, My Perspective Has Switched”

    Open Access•Suzanne S Hudd, Robert A Smart et al.•Teaching Sociology•2011

  • Toward a Sociology of Writing

    Keith A Roberts•Teaching Sociology•1993

  • Writing a Sociological Student Term Paper

    Ali Kamali•Teaching Sociology•1991

  • Creating and Teaching Writing-Intensive Courses

    Liz Grauerholz•Teaching Sociology•1999

  • Moving Forward Looking Backward

    Open Access•Suzanne S Hudd, Eric Franklyn Bronson•Teaching Sociology•2007

  • Teaching Sociology Through Student Portfolios

    Open Access•Barbara Trepagnier•Teaching Sociology•2004

  • I Think My Mark Is Too High

    John Thompson•Teaching Sociology•1994

  • Teaching Writing in Sociology

    Léon Anderson, Mara Holt•Teaching Sociology•1990

  • Writing before Students

    Mark Edwards, Mark Evan Edwards•Teaching Sociology•2002

  • Teaching Writing within a Sociology Course

    Mervyn L Cadwallader, C Allen Scarboro•Teaching Sociology•1982

  • Sociological Writing as Higher-level Thinking

    Open Access•Rebekah Peeples Massengill•Teaching Sociology•2011

  • Analyzing the News

    Open Access•Nancy L Malcom•Teaching Sociology•2006

  • Mind, Self, and Society

    George Herbert Mead, Charles W Morris•Mind, self, and society•1967

  • Generic Processes in the Reproduction of Inequality

    Michael Schwalbe, Sandra Godwin et al.•Social Forces•2000

  • The Mundanity of Excellence

    Daniel F Chambli, Daniel F Chambliss•Sociological Theory•1989

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,54
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae