Time, space, and action
Exploring the narrative structure and its linguistic marking
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11273096 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yves Bestgen (0000-0001-7407-7797, UCLouvain, corresponding author), Jean Costermans (UCLouvain) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 421-446 |
| Publication date | 1994-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Processes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01638539409544877 |
| OpenAlex | W2010058467 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 38 |
In a highly specific field of the study of discourse, two experiments were conducted to analyze the principles that determine the structure of narratives and the use of elements that highlight that structure. In both, subjects received ordered lists of statements that described a person's activities during an afternoon. In the first experiment, groups of subjects performed one of four tasks using these lists. Some subjects rated the similarity of two activities described in consecutive statements, others indicated the natural hierarchical divisions in the activities and then carried out a forced‐choice task to select several connectives, and still others rewrote the statement list with punctuation and connectives. Comparison of these tasks showed that the similarity ratings were highly correlated with the hierarchical divisions, and that divisions which were high up in the hierarchy were relatively likely to be marked by time‐anchoring phrases (“at 2 o'clock”). In the second study, major or minor changes in location were introduced into the statement lists prior to either a deep or a shallow break. The subjects first indicated the hierarchical divisions within the sequences and then chose among alternative temporal connectives. The hierarchical judgments were affected by the place changes. However, the locations of the most important breaks as identified in the first study did not change. Linguistic marking was more sensitive to the changes in location. All in all, this study showed that it is possible to empirically isolate the parameters that determine the structure of a discourse and its marking
Action (physics · Cognitive psychology · Hierarchy · Linguistics · Narrative · Natural language processing · Punctuation · Similarity (geometry · Statement (logic · Task (project management · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Using connectives in oral French narratives
Domain Restriction in Generic Statements
Using Applied Conversation Analysis to Teach Novice Dietitians History Taking Skills
The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing
Effect on Comprehension of Preposed versus Postposed Adverbial Phrases
Segmentation markers as trace and signal of discourse structure
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
The Thread of Discourse
Discourse Markers
Cohesion in English
Nominal and temporal anaphora
Inference during reading.
Mental Models in Narrative Comprehension
Scripts in memory for text
Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension
Strategies of discourse comprehension
What do paragraph markings do
Binding and unfolding
Recursion in the paragraph as a unit of discourse development
Discourse organization and sentence form
The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring
Clustering analysis of subjective partitions of text∗
Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts
The Pear Stories
Theta Reliability and Factor Scaling
Selective perception of events
Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior
Two styles of narrative construction and their linguistic and educational implications
Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure
Linguistic and social constraints on storytelling
Spatial Networks as a Site for the Study of Language and Thought
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,19 |
| Citation span | 1995 - 2020 (26) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |