Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Self-serving bias in redistribution choices

Accounting for beliefs and norms

Bibliographic Data

ID11288628
AuthorsDianna R Amasino (0000-0001-9092-3877, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, corresponding author), Davide Pace (Tinbergen Institute), Davide Domenico Pace, Joël J Van Der Weele (0000-0002-1855-9289, Tinbergen Institute), Joël van der Weele
Year2023
Volume98
Pages102654
Publication date2023-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Economic Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-4870 • E-ISSN: 1872-7719
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.joep.2023.102654
OpenAlexW4384207782
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited49

We explore the psychological mechanisms underlying self-serving redistribution decisions in an experimental setting. This self-serving bias in redistribution has been attributed not only to self-interest, but also to constructs such as differing beliefs about the hard work or luck underlying inequality, differing fairness views, and differing perceptions of social norms. In this study, we directly measure each of these potential mechanisms and compare their mediating roles in the relationship between status and redistribution. In our experiment, participants complete real-effort tasks and then are randomly assigned a high or low pay rate per correct answer to exogenously induce (dis)advantaged status. Participants are then paired and those assigned the role of dictator decide how to divide their joint earnings. We find that advantaged dictators keep more for themselves than disadvantaged dictators and report different fairness views and beliefs about task performance, but not different perceptions of social norms. Further, only fairness views play a significant mediating role between status and allocation differences, suggesting this is the primary mechanism underlying self-serving differences in support for redistribution

Dictator game · Disadvantaged · Earnings · Economics · Inequality · Inequity aversion · Luck · Perception · Political science · Redistribution (election · Social preferences · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Effect of anthropomorphic design and hierarchical status on balancing self-serving bias

    Open Access•Min Wu, Zhaotong Li et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • How to increase public support for carbon pricing with revenue recycling

    Open Access•Andrej Woerner, Taisuke Imai et al.•Nature Sustainability•2024

  • When emotional responses conflict with self-interested impulses

    Open Access•Xile Yin, Jianbiao Li et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2023

  • Just Luck

    Alexander W Cappelen, James Konow et al.•American Economic Review•2013

  • A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition

    David Gill, Victoria Prowse et al.•American Economic Review•2012

  • Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments

    Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter•American Economic Review•2000

  • Preferences for Redistribution and Perception of Fairness: An Experimental Study

    Open Access•Ruben Durante, Louis Putterman et al.•Journal of the European Economic…•2014

  • The Formation of Beliefs

    Rafael Di Tella, S Galiant et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2007

  • A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

    Open Access•Carl A Kallgren, Raymond R Reno et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • Fair Shares

    James Konow•American Economic Review•2000

  • Incentives and Prosocial Behavior

    Roland Bénabou, Jean Tirole•American Economic Review•2006

  • The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals

    Alexander W Cappelen, Astri Drange Hole et al.•American Economic Review•2007

  • Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?

    Open Access•Erin L Krupka, Roberto A Weber•Journal of the European Economic…•2013

  • Reference Points and Effort Provision

    Johannes Abeler, Aliya Falk et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • Hardnose the Dictator

    Todd L Cherry, Peter Frykblom et al.•American Economic Review•2002

  • Process Analysis

    Open Access•Charles M Judd, D A Kenny•Evaluation Review•1981

  • Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms

    Open Access•Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2013

  • Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half

    Open Access•Gregg Sparkman, Nathaniel Geiger et al.•Nature Communications•2022

  • Debiasing preferences over redistribution

    Open Access•Ricardo Espinosa, Bruno Deffains et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2020

  • If I Could Do It, So Can They

    Open Access•Hyunjin J Koo, Paul K Piff et al.•Social Psychological and…•2023

  • A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

    Robert B Cialdini, Carl A Kallgren et al.•Advances in Experimental Social…•1991

  • Misperceived Social Norms

    Leonardo Bursztyn, Alessandra L González et al.•American Economic Review•2020

  • The consistency of fairness rules

    Paloma Ubeda•Journal of Economic Psychology•2014

  • The role of generalised reciprocity and reciprocal tendencies in the emergence of cooperative group norms

    Open Access•Miguel Salazar, Daniel J Shaw et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2022

  • Social norms and cooperation in real-life social dilemmas

    Open Access•John Thøgersen•Journal of Economic Psychology•2008

  • Sacrifice

    Open Access•Catherine C Eckel, Enrique Fatás et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2022

  • On the malleability of fairness ideals

    Open Access•Kathrin Dengler-Roscher, Natalia Montinari et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2018

  • Erasing Ethnicity? Propaganda, Nation Building, and Identity in Rwanda

    Arthur Blouin, Sharun W Mukand et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2018

  • Experimenting with Measurement Error

    Ben Gillen, Erik Snowberg et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2018

  • The Merit Primacy Effect

    Open Access•Alexander W Cappelen, Karl Ove Moene et al.•The Economic Journal•2022

  • The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen, Martin Fishbein•Journal of Experimental Social…•1970

  • Fairness and preference

    Open Access•David M Messick, Keith P Sentis•Journal of Experimental Social…•1979

  • Ideology of Affluence

    Elizabeth Suhay, Marko Klašnja et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Self-serving biases in the attribution process

    Gifford W Bradley•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • Explaining Bargaining Impasse

    Open Access•Linda Babcock, G Loewenstein•The Journal of Economic…•1997

  • Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality

    Dale T Miller, M G Ro et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1975

  • Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models

    Clifford C Clogg, Eva Petkova et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1995

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae