A comparative analysis on alternative approaches to literacy instruction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11424528 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hui‐Fang Shang (0000-0002-2481-9454, corresponding author), H-F Shang |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 291-299 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Lifelong Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-1370 • E-ISSN: 1464-519X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02601370050110356 |
| OpenAlex | W2077820868 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
The purpose of this paper is to make a thorough analysis of the comparisons between the alternative approaches: natural approach, whole language approach, learner-centered approach, and participatory approach. The rationale, design, use, and research findings about the effectiveness ineffectiveness of each approach will be compared and presented. Also, conclusions about effective instructional components to include in an adult language programme will be discussed
Citizen journalism · Literacy · Management science · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Engineering · Literacy, Media, and Education · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |