Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review

Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model

Bibliographic Data

ID11623962
AuthorsJeffrey A Segal (Stony Brook University), Chad Westerland (0009-0002-3458-3884, University of Arizona), Stefanie A Lindquist
Year2010
Volume55
Issue1
Pages89-104
Publication date2010-10-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00480.x
OpenAlexW3126039551
LanguageEN
Citations received70
References cited38

Recent scholarship suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court might be constrained by Congress in constitutional cases. We suggest two potential paths to Congressional influence on the Court's constitutional decisions: a rational-anticipation model, in which the Court moves away from its preferences in order to avoid being overruled, and an institutional-maintenance model, in which the Court protects itself against Congressional attacks to its institutional prerogatives by scaling back its striking of laws when the distance between the Court and Congress increases. We test these models by using Common Space scores and the original roll-call votes to estimate support in the current Congress for the original legislation and the Court's preferences over that legislation. We find that the Court does not appear to consider the likelihood of override in constitutional cases, but it does back away from striking laws when it is ideologically distant from Congress

Certiorari · Constitution · Constitutional court · Legislation · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • O Supremo Tribunal Federal

    Fernando Ramalho Ney Montenegro Bentes•2015

  • Curbing the Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Curbing the Court•2020

  • National Policy Preferences and Judicial Review of State Statutes at the United States Supreme Court

    Stefanie A Lindquist, Pamela C Corley•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2012

  • Measuring Judicial Appeasement of the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Donald Snyder, Caitlyn Pierce•American Politics Research•2026

  • No Shelter in Unanimity

    Open Access•J Robison•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Judicial Deference and Executive Control Over Administrative Agencies

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • How Courts Structure State-Level Representation

    Open Access•Jonathan P Kastellec•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2018

  • Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Tom S Clark•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • The Swing Justice

    Peter K Enns, Patrick C Wohlfarth•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Judicial Majoritarianism

    Matthew E K Hall, Joseph Daniel Ura•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Presidential Constraints on Supreme Court Decision-Making

    Paul J Gardner, Paul Gardner et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Pivotal Politics as Normal Science

    Keith Krehbiel•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Decision Making on the World Court

    Open Access•Arthur Dyevre•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2025

  • Understanding Judicial Power

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Jason H Windett•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Case Salience and the Influence of External Constraints on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Logan Strother•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Political Competition and Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, David Carlson et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • On Separation of Powers and Obfuscation in US Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•Daniel Lempert•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • Judicial Ideology in the Absence of Rights

    Open Access•Zoë Robinson, Patrick Leslie et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • The Conditioning Role of Judicial Independence in the Exercise of Judicial Review

    Open Access•Garrett N Vande Kamp•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Reevaluating the Implications of Decision-Making Models

    Open Access•Ali S Masood, Donald R Songer•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Beyond Liberal and Conservative

    Open Access•Rob Robinson, Brendon Swedlow•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Lane•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric

    Open Access•Colin Glennon, Logan Strother•Journal of Law and Courts•2019

  • Stepping on Congress

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Alyx Mark et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • Judicial Federalism and Representation

    Open Access•Jonathan P Kastellec•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Lacking Legislative Experience

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Judicial Guardians

    Open Access•Lisa Hager, Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Lower Courts in Interbranch Conflict

    Open Access•Joshua A Strayhorn•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Blurring Institutional Boundaries

    Open Access•Alyx Mark, Michael A Zilis•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Preserving Institutional Power

    Open Access•Bryan W Marshall, Brett Curry et al.•Politics & Policy•2014

  • The Impact of Divided Government on the Supreme Court Appointment Process

    Open Access•Hemant Sharma, John M Scheb•Politics & Policy•2011

  • A Case for Supreme Court Term Limits? The Changing Ideological Relationship between Appointing Presidents and Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•Hemant Sharma, Colin Glennon•Politics & Policy•2013

  • The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Tonja Jacobi•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2010

  • The Supreme Court and Congress

    Open Access•Maron W Sorenson•American Politics Research•2025

  • Mixed Signals? Rethinking How Ideology and Institutional Motivations Shape the Solicitor General’s Positions

    Open Access•Kirsten Widner, Elizabeth A Lane•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Severability Doctrine and the Exercise of Judicial Review

    Open Access•Garrett N Vande Kamp•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, David A Hughes•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The Law

    Open Access•Jennifer L Selin, Caylie Milazzo•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Ideologists, Non-Ideologists and the Construct Validity of One-Dimensional Measures of Political Ideology

    Open Access•Yoav Ganzach, Yaacov Schul•Social Indicators Research•2025

  • How institutions structure judicial behaviour

    Lee Epstein•University of Toronto Law Journal•2019

  • Ideology and Risk Focus

    Open Access•Gordon Ballingrud•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Double-Bind on the Bench

    Open Access•Kjersten Nelson•Politics & Gender•2015

  • Greater public confidence in the US Supreme Court predicts more jurisdiction stripping

    Open Access•Joseph Daniel Ura, Patrick C Wohlfarth•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Legislative Coalitions and Judicial Turnover under Political Uncertainty

    Open Access•Santiago Basabe-Serrano, J Polga-Hecimovich•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • The Conditional Effectiveness of Legislative Threats

    Open Access•Alyx Mark, Michael A Zilis•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • Executive Power and Judicial Deference

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Correcting the Record

    Open Access•Lee Elton Dionne•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Restraining the Court

    Open Access•Alyx Mark, Michael A Zilis•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Deciding Not to Decide

    Open Access•Robert J Hume•Law & Society Review•2014

  • An Analysis of Policy-Based Congressional Responses to the U.S. Supreme Court's Constitutional Decisions

    Open Access•Bethany Blackstone•Law & Society Review•2013

  • Political and constitutional overrides

    Open Access•Olof Larsson•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty

    Open Access•Olof Larsson, Daniel Naurin•International Organization•2016

  • The Court of Justice and treaty revision

    Open Access•José Luis Castro-Montero, Edwin Alblas et al.•European Union Politics•2018

  • Pushing Boundaries

    Open Access•Philipp Schroeder•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Institutional Bargaining for Democratic Theorists (or How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Haggling)

    Open Access•Jack Knight, Melissa Schwartzberg•Annual Review of Political Science•2020

  • Reconsidering Judicial Preferences

    Lee Epstein, Jack Knight•Annual Review of Political Science•2013

  • The Semiconstrained Court

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Understanding the Role of the European Court of Justice in European Integration

    Open Access•CLIFFORD J CARRUBA, Matthew Gabel et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

  • US Supreme Court Institutional Integrity in Case Selection

    Open Access•Gordon Ballingrud•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Ideological Polarization on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Donald Michael Gooch•American Politics Research•2015

  • Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Supreme Court Oral Arguments and Institutional Maintenance

    Open Access•Eve M Ringsmuth, Timothy R Johnson•American Politics Research•2013

  • Testing Judicial Power

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•American Politics Research•2015

  • Judicial self fashioning

    Open Access•Rosamond Elizabeth Thalken, David Mimno et al.•Discourse Studies•2024

  • Judges as Party Animals

    Open Access•Ross M Stolzenberg, James Lindgren•American Sociological Review•2022

  • The Influence of Congressional Preferences on Legislative Overrides of Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Alicia Uribe, Alicia Bernice Uribe et al.•Law & Society Review•2014

  • A Social Movement Model for Judicial Behavior

    Open Access•Luiz Vilaça•Social Forces•2024

  • Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Spatial Models of Parliamentary…•2005

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy

    J Ferejohn, Charles R Shipan et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1990

  • Congressional Control or Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Pablo T Spiller, Rafael Gely•The RAND Journal of Economics•1992

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • Pivotal Politics

    Keith Krehbiel•Pivotal Politics•1998

  • Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts

    Open Access•Stefanie A Lindquist, Rorie Spill Solberg•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Between Law and Politics

    Open Access•Nancy Kassop•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2004

  • The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights

    Richard H Rosswurm, Michael J Perry•Human Rights Quarterly•1984

  • Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review

    Robert Lowry Clinton, Robert Clinton•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution

    James Meernik, Joseph Ignagni•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Court Curbing, Court Reversals, and Judicial Review

    Open Access•Roger Handberg, Harold F Hill•Law & Society Review•1980

  • Interpose Your Friendly Hand”

    Open Access•Keith E Whittington•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research

    Adrian E Raftery•Sociological Methodology•1995

  • Identifying the Median Justice on the Supreme Court through Multidimensional Scaling

    Open Access•B Grofman, Timothy J Brazill•Public Choice•2002

  • Congress Confronts the Court

    Open Access•Mark A Graber•Political Science Quarterly•2002

  • The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights

    Open Access•C Herman Pritchett•Political Science Quarterly•1983

  • Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales

    Keith T Poole•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power

    Open Access•Gerald N Rosenberg, Gerald Rosenberg•The Review of Politics•1992

  • Gatekeeping

    Christophe Crombez, Tim Groseclose et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Brian R Sala, James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making

    Open Access•Mario Bergara, Barak D Richman et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Pulling Punches

    Open Access•Anna Harvey, Barry Friedman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship

    Keith Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Inviting Congressional Action

    Lori Hausegger, Lawrence Baum•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Tom S Clark•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Signals from the Tenth Justice

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Brian Kamoie et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy

    Open Access•Jack Knight, Lee Epstein•Law & Society Review•1996

  • The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Barry R Weingast•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1997

  • How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas

    Open Access•Howard Gillman•American Political Science Review•2002

Unique citing works70
Citations per year4,12
Citation span2009 - 2026 (18)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 69

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae