Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas

Federal Courts in the United States, 1875-1891

Bibliographic Data

ID3153148
AuthorsHoward Gillman (University of Southern California, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume96
Issue3
Pages511-524
Publication date2002-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055402000291
OpenAlexW2148798521
LanguageEN
Citations received83
References cited29

This case study of late-nineteenth century federal courts in the United States sheds light on two seemingly unrelated questions of general interest to political scientists: What tools are available to party leaders who seek to institutionalize their policy agendas or insulate those agendas from electoral politics? and How do we account for expansions of judicial power? Using an historical-interpretive analysis of partisan agendas, party control of national institutions, congressional initiatives relating to federal courts, the appointment of federal judges, judicial decision making, and litigation patterns, I demonstrate that the increased power, jurisdiction, and conservatism of federal courts during this period was a by-product of Republican Party efforts to promote and entrench a policy of economic nationalism during a time when that agenda was vulnerable to electoral politics. In addition to offering an innovative interpretation of these developments, I discuss the implications arising from this case study for our standard accounts of partisan politics, political development, and the determinants of judicial decision making

Conservatism · Jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • Curbing the Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Curbing the Court•2020

  • The Oxford Handbook of American Political Development

    Suzanne ca /21 Jh Mettler, Robert C Lieberman et al.•Oxford Handbook of American…•2014

  • The Countermajoritarian Difficulty Revisited

    Open Access•Warren Snead, K Ramanathan•Perspectives on Politics•2026

  • Democracy, Inequality, and Antitrust

    Michael O Allen, Kenneth Scheve et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • Keeping the Outliers in Line? Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Ryan C Black•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Arguing Gunwall

    Open Access•Richard S Price•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Responsibility Attribution for Supreme Court Decision-Making

    Open Access•Robin Bayes, K Ramanathan et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • Lacking Legislative Experience

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Judicial Guardians

    Open Access•Lisa Hager, Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Minority Rights, Governing Regimes, or Secular Elites

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Thomas M Keck et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • Constitutional Text and Institutional Development

    Matthew S Brogdon•American Political Thought•2016

  • Variable Constitutional Authority

    Wayne D Moore•American Political Thought•2013

  • Political Jurisprudence and the Role of the Supreme Court

    Matthew S Brogdon•American Political Thought•2017

  • Public Law Litigation

    Open Access•Helen Hershkoff•Human Rights Review•2008

  • Indeterminate sovereignty and the rule of law

    Open Access•Matthew L Williams•British Politics•2015

  • A master of two servants

    Open Access•Mordechai E Schwarz•Constitutional Political Economy•2022

  • The Relative (Un)Importance of Rehnquist Court Decisions

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Politics & Policy•2010

  • Explanations for the Vanishing Trial in the United States

    Open Access•Sarah Staszak•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2022

  • Paying Attention to What Judges Say

    Open Access•Keith J Bybee•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2012

  • Compared to What? Judicial Review and Other Veto Points in Contemporary Democratic Theory

    Open Access•David Watkins, Scott E Lemieux•Perspectives on Politics•2015

  • Constitutionalism and Political Science

    Mark A Graber•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • Law, Politics, and Democracy in the Twenty-first Century

    Open Access•Jenny Pickerill•Perspectives on Politics•2011

  • Policy, Position-Taking, and Congressional Voting under Judicial Review

    Open Access•McKinzie Craig, Joseph Daniel Ura•American Politics Research•2025

  • Pushing Constitutional Limits in the U.S. States

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Eve M Ringsmuth et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2015

  • Constructing Judicial Review

    Mark A Graber•Annual Review of Political Science•2005

  • Congress Opens the Courthouse Doors

    Open Access•Joseph L Smith•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • To Render Prompt Justice”

    Open Access•Michael A Dichio, Logan Strother et al.•Studies in American Political…•2022

  • Institutions, Rulemaking, and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment

    Open Access•Sarah Staszak•Studies in American Political…•2010

  • Judicial Partisanship and the Slaughterhouse Cases

    Open Access•Gregory Elinson•Studies in American Political…•2017

  • No Bodies to Kick or Souls to Damn”

    Open Access•Anthony Grasso•Studies in American Political…•2020

  • Westward Expansion, Preappointment Politics, and the Making of the Southern Slaveholding Supreme Court

    Open Access•Justin Crowe•Studies in American Political…•2010

  • Before the Countermajoritarian Difficulty

    Open Access•Stephen M Engel•Studies in American Political…•2009

  • To Change the Fundamental Law of the State”

    Open Access•Emily Zackin•Studies in American Political…•2010

  • Manufacturing a Protestant Consensus

    Open Access•John W Compton•Studies in American Political…•2023

  • The U.S. Supreme Court Is Not a Dahlian Court

    Open Access•Paul Baumgardner, Calvin Terbeek•Studies in American Political…•2022

  • Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools

    Open Access•Thomas M Keck•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • Free Expression and Judicial Power in Colombia, India, and South Africa

    Open Access•Sandra Botero, Rachel Ellett et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2020

  • Congressional Attacks on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Dave Bridge, Curt Nichols•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Rethinking Regime Politics

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Realizing the Rights Revolution

    Open Access•Sarah Staszak•Law & Social Inquiry•2013

  • Presidents, Political Regimes, and Contentious Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Kevin J Mcmahon•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • In Defense of Asbestos Tort Litigation

    Open Access•Jeb Barnes•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • Legislative-Executive Conflict and Private Statutory Litigation in the United States

    Open Access•Sean Farhang•Law & Social Inquiry•2011

  • Permutations of Judicial Power

    Open Access•Shannon Roesler•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • In Defense of Asbestos Tort Litigation

    Open Access•Jeb Barnes•Law & Social Inquiry•2008

  • Law and American Political Development

    Open Access•Paul Frymer•Law & Social Inquiry•2008

  • Anatomy of Judicial Backlash

    Open Access•Ruth Bloch Rubin, Gregory Elinson•Law & Social Inquiry•2017

  • Movement Litigation and Unilateral Disarmament

    Open Access•Richard S Price, Thomas M Keck•Law & Social Inquiry•2014

  • The Law

    Open Access•Aman McLeod•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Judicial institution and innovation

    Open Access•Liyang Wan, Qian Wan et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2025

  • Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Chad Westerland et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Interpose Your Friendly Hand”

    Open Access•Keith E Whittington•American Political Science Review•2005

  • The Formation of Judicial Federalism in the United States

    Matthew S Brogdon•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2018

  • An Innate Sense of Fairness

    Matthew H Bosworth•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2006

  • The Constitutional Court and the judicialization of Spanish politics

    Jean-Baptiste Harguindéguy•European Politics and Society•2023

  • Acting When Elected Officials Won't

    Paul Frymer•American Political Science Review•2003

  • Judicial Majoritarianism

    Matthew E K Hall, Joseph Daniel Ura•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • The Forging of Judicial Autonomy

    Justin Crowe•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • State Attorneys General and their Challenges to Federal Policies

    Open Access•Michael A Dichio, Phillip Singer•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2023

  • Beyond the “Countermajoritarian Difficulty

    Open Access•Scott E Lemieux, David Watkins et al.•Polity•2009

  • Institutions, Interests, and Judicial Outcomes

    Open Access•Brett Curry•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Comparative Analysis of Judicial Power

    Open Access•Michael W Mccann, Michael Mccann•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Punctuated Equilibrium and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism

    Jenny Pickerill, J Mitchell Pickerill et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2004

  • Judicial Procedures as Instruments of Political Control

    Open Access•Joseph L Smith•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Getting a Poor Return

    Open Access•Robert M Howard•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2008

  • Why do lawmakers seek to sanction state courts

    Jonathan S Hack•Journal of Legislative Studies•2022

  • Bringing the Courts Back In

    Jeb Barnes•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts

    Ran Hirschl•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Martin Shapiro and the Movement From “Old” to “New” Institutionalist Studies in Public Law Scholarship

    Howard Gillman•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  • Polarization and the Judiciary

    Richard L Hasen•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • The Curious Case of School Prayer

    Open Access•Bradley D Hays•Politics and Religion•2012

  • Ideological Polarization on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Donald Michael Gooch•American Politics Research•2015

  • The Mask of Neutrality

    Open Access•Jordan Carr Peterson•Law & Policy•2019

  • Heurs et malheurs de la légalité dans les sociétés contemporaines. une sociologie politique de la « judiciarisation

    Jacques Commaille, Laurence Dumoulin•L Année sociologique•2009

  • Juízes profissionais? Padrões de carreira dos integrantes das Supremas Cortes de Brasil (1829-2008) e Estados Unidos (1789-2008)

    Open Access•Luciano Da Ros•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2012

  • Institutional Paths to Policy Change

    Open Access•Udi Sommer, Victor Asal et al.•Law & Society Review•2013

  • Networked Justice

    Open Access•Matthew C Ingram, Matthew Ingram•Journal of Latin American Studies•2016

  • Constitutions Unentrenched

    Open Access•Mila Versteeg, Emily Zackin•American Political Science Review•2016

  • Party, Policy, or Duty

    Open Access•Thomas M Keck•American Political Science Review•2007

  • A Judicialização Foi Televisionada

    Open Access•João Feres Junior, Patricia Bandeira De Melo et al.•Caderno CRH•2020

  • Mandates, Geography, and Networks

    Open Access•Matthew C Ingram, Matthew Ingram•Latin American Politics and Society•2016

  • Reconstruction

    Eric Foner•Reconstruction•2005

  • Justice accused

    Robert M Cover•Justice accused•1975

  • Yankee Leviathan

    Open Access•Richard Franklin Bensel•Yankee Leviathan•1991

  • Building a New American State

    Open Access•Stephen Skowronek•Building a New American State•1982

  • The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts

    Open Access•J Mark Ramseyer•The Journal of Legal Studies•1994

  • Choosing Not To Choose

    Open Access•Stefan Voigt, Eli Salzberger et al.•Kyklos•2002

  • Constitutionalism and Democracy

    Jon Elster, Rune Slagstad et al.•Constitutionalism and Democracy•2017

  • Establishing Judicial Review? Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court

    Open Access•Mark A Graber•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Federalist or Friends of Adams

    Open Access•Mark A Graber•Studies in American Political…•1998

  • Lochner Revisionism Revisited

    Open Access•Gary D Rowe•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

  • The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization

    Open Access•Ran Hirschl•Law & Social Inquiry•2000

  • Lawyers and the Constitution

    W P M Kennedy, Benjamin R Twiss•University of Toronto Law Journal•1943

  • The Business of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Edward S Corwin•Political Science Quarterly•1928

  • American Law and the Marketing Structure of the Large Corporation, 1875–1890

    Open Access•Charles W Mccurdy•The Journal of Economic History•1978

  • The Federal Courts, Localism, and the National Economy, 1865–1900

    Open Access•Tony Freyer, Tony A Freyer•The Business History Review•1979

  • Federal Justice in California

    Victoria A Saker, Christian G Fritz et al.•American Journal of Legal History•1993

  • The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power, 1863-1875

    William M Wiecek•American Journal of Legal History•1969

  • The Supreme Court in American Politics

    George Dargo, Howard Gillman et al.•American Journal of Legal History•2000

  • Studies in the History of the United States Courts of the Third Circuit

    Richard A Brisbin, Stephen B Presser et al.•American Journal of Legal History•1984

  • Constructing a Supranational Constitution

    Open Access•Alec Stone Sweet, Thomas L Brunell•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Supreme Court, The Populist Movement and the Campaign of 1896

    Alan Furman Westin•The Journal of Politics•1953

  • Judicialization of Politics in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Maurice Sunkin•International Political Science…•1994

  • Europe Before the Court

    Open Access•Anne-Marie Burley, Walter Mattli•International Organization•1993

  • Judicialization and the Construction of Governance

    Open Access•Alec Stone Sweet•Comparative Political Studies•1999

  • Decision Making in Political Systems

    Open Access•George Tsebelis•British Journal of Political…•1995

  • The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law

    Open Access•Barry R Weingast•American Political Science Review•1997

  • On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy

    Open Access•Jack Knight, Lee Epstein•Law & Society Review•1996

  • Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development

    Open Access•Mancur Olson•American Political Science Review•1993

Unique citing works83
Citations per year3,61
Citation span2003 - 2026 (24)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 83

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae