Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Democracy, Inequality, and Antitrust

Bibliographic Data

ID10185804
AuthorsMichael O Allen (0000-0002-3775-0628, Stanford University), Kenneth Scheve (0000-0002-6809-0060, University of Notre Dame), David Stasavage (0000-0001-9964-716X, New York University)
Year2025
Volume88
Issue1
Pages000-000
Publication date2025-04-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/736023
OpenAlexW4409139552
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited59

This article investigates the relationship between democracy and antitrust policy. Strong antitrust policies advance the economic and political interests of most citizens, making their adoption more likely in institutional settings that weigh the interests of consumers. We examine the empirical relationship between democracy, inequality, and antitrust policies in a broad panel of countries from 1951 to 2010. Using a variety of empirical strategies, we find that democracy is predictive of stricter antitrust policies in countries with low but not high levels of inequality. This result accords with the idea that economic inequality can undermine the political forces that tend toward stronger antitrust policy in democracies. We then investigate a supposed exception to this pattern: the United States in the late 19th century. Through a mixed-methods analysis, we present evidence that democracy and inequality shaped the politics of antitrust in this era in a way that resonates with our cross-country analysis.

Democracy · Economics · Inequality · Law and economics · Mathematical analysis · Neoclassical economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Mathematics · Political Economy and Marxism · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Competition Law and Varieties of Capitalism in the Long Run

    Open Access•Chase Foster, Sebastian Kohl•Governance•2026

  • The Curse of Bigness

    Tim Wu•Curse of Bigness•2018

  • Tying the Autocrat's Hands

    Open Access•Yuhua Wang•Tying the Autocrat's Hands•2014

  • Top Incomes Over the Twentieth Century

    A B Atkinson, Thomas Piketty•Top Incomes over the Twentieth…•2007

  • Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions

    Daron Acemoglu, James A Robinson•American Economic Review•2008

  • Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

    Open Access•Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2014

  • The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications

    Open Access•Jan De Loecker, Jan Eeckhout et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2020

  • The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms

    Open Access•David Autor, David Dorn et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2020

  • Concentrating on the Fall of the Labor Share

    David Autor, David Dorn et al.•American Economic Review•2017

  • Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

    Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D’Haultfœuille•American Economic Review•2020

  • Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing

    Open Access•Andrew Goodman-Bacon•Journal of Econometrics•2021

  • A Firm-Level Perspective on the Role of Rents in the Rise in Inequality

    Jason Furman, Peter R Orszag et al.•Toward a Just Society•2018

  • The New Brandeis Movement

    Lina Khan•Journal of European Competition…•2018

  • The Struggle for Constitutional Power

    Open Access•Tamir Moustafa•Struggle for Constitutional Power•2007

  • Sustaining Capitalism and Democracy

    Open Access•Michael O Allen, Kenneth Scheve•International Studies Review•2022

  • Cartels, competition, and coalitions

    Erik Peinert•Review of International Political…•2020

  • Regulation of privatized utilities

    Open Access•Eduardo Bitrán, Pablo Serra•World Development•1998

  • Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time

    Open Access•Frederick Solt•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • Killer Acquisitions

    Colleen Cunningham, Florian Ederer et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2020

  • Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives

    Miguel Antón, Florian Ederer et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2022

  • Law and Economic Policy in America

    Barry Supple, William Letwin•Economica•1968

  • Conditional Status Quo Bias and Top Income Shares

    Peter K Enns, Nathan J Kelly et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • The Remaking of an American Senate

    William Bernhard, Brian R Sala•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • From rule‐takerto rule‐promotingregulatory state

    Open Access•Moohyung Cho, Tim Büthe•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Institutional Change and the Electoral Connection in the Senate

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Jonathan Mummolo et al.•Political Analysis•2019

  • Testing Theories of American Politics

    Open Access•Martin Gilens, Benjamin I Page•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007

    Open Access•Carles Boix, Michael K Miller et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Matching Methods for Causal Inference with Time‐Series Cross‐Sectional Data

    Open Access•Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Economic Performance and Elite Defection from Hegemonic Parties

    Open Access•Ora John Reuter, Jill Gandhi et al.•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • The politics of market reforms

    Thomas Kalinowski•Contemporary Politics•2009

  • Towards a Political Theory of the Firm

    Open Access•Luigi Zingales•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • A Muted Fury

    Richard Schneirov, William G Ro et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1997

  • Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker•American Political Science Review•2004

  • How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas

    Open Access•Howard Gillman•American Political Science Review•2002

  • The History of the Standard Oil Company

    Mildred Hartsough, Ida M Tarbell et al.•Social Forces•1926

  • Winner-Take-All Politics

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker, Paul Pierson•Latin American Politics and Society•2010

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae