Peerless Science
Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11629567 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cole (0000-0002-3199-7486, corresponding author), Stephen Cole, E J Hackett (0000-0002-7935-4498) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 603-603 |
| Publication date | 1991-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | REVIEW |
| Review of | Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy, Daryl E Chubin, 1990 |
| Venue | Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0094-3061 • E-ISSN: 1939-8638 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2071849 |
| OpenAlex | W2338603689 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Peer review · Political science · Science policy · Sociology · Law · Public Administration · Research, Science, and Academia · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
The Ups and Downs of Peer Review
Permanent Tenure and Academic Freedom in Engineering
Five Arguments for Increasing Public Participation in Making Science Policy
Science, Technology, & Human Values at Fifty
The Sokal Affair in Context
Mind the Gap
Fairness as Appropriateness
Governing Science
Peer Review
Hyperauthorship
Women in interdisciplinary science
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier
Peer Review and Quality Control in Science
Patterns and practices in fisheries assessment peer review systems
Interdisciplinary knowledge integration as a unique knowledge source for technology development and the role of funding allocation
The rise of responsible metrics as a professional reform movement
Towards theorizing peer review
Exclusionary Epideictic
A avaliação da ciência e a revisão por pares
Uma teoria do abuso da História
Biopolitics and Population Aesthetics
Renewing Aristotelian theory
A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review
Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and a Scientific Realism Debate That Makes a Difference
Latin American Science and Technology Policy
Anthropology in and of the academy
Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality
Unleashing generative AI
Challenges to research systems, academic research and knowledge production in East Asia
Fairly Balanced
Good Science Gets Funded
Setting Boundaries between Science and Law
Changing times for scholarly communication
Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia
Revistas científicas e a constituição do campo de estudos de gênero
Social epistemology and the ethics of research
Negotiated Measures
Mavericks and lotteries
A Heuristic Strategy for the Study of Human Affairs
The Administrative Costs of Congressional Earmarking
Forum
Interdisciplinary Research, Tenure Review, and Guardians of the Disciplinary Order
Science as a Vocation in the 1990s
Contemporary Academic Publishing
Perceptions of Research Misconduct and an Analysis of Their Correlates
A Social Control Perspective on Scientific Misconduct
Impure Science
Peer review and the relevance of science
Scientific Culture and Educational Research
Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements
Managing Laboratory Work through Skepticism
Can evaluation contribute to the organizational development of academic institutions? An international comparison
Peer Review and the Dilemmas of Quality Control in Programme Accreditation in South African Higher Education
Professional autonomy vs industrial control
Publishing and impact criteria, and their bearing on Translation Studies
Academic judgments under uncertainty
Communication Regimes in Competition
Inside regular lab meetings
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
The Ambivalence of Peer Review
Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews
The Power of Peer Review on Transdisciplinary Discovery
Judging Importance before Checking Correctness
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review
Peer review assessment of originality in tourism journals
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |